Author Topic: New Panther Tank  (Read 21228 times)

Offline Fox

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 169
Re: New Panther Tank
« Reply #150 on: December 05, 2010, 04:27:42 PM »
The top turret armor on the Panther, according to the information I have found on the internet, is about the same as the current panzer IV H.  For comparison,

Tiger, 26mm
Sherman, 25mm
T34/85, 20mm
Panzer IV H, 16mm
Panther, 16 mm

The current panzer is easily killed with the IL2 or B25H.  If the Panther is the same, then it will be very vulnerable to air attack.

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: New Panther Tank
« Reply #151 on: December 05, 2010, 08:01:16 PM »
where's all the world of tank guys w/ their 2 cent input ????
******
thats all you get for two cents
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: New Panther Tank
« Reply #152 on: December 05, 2010, 08:03:54 PM »
M-18!!!! :noid :furious
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6166
Re: New Panther Tank
« Reply #153 on: December 05, 2010, 08:52:16 PM »
this is ture, any weapon 7.62mm or bigger is a threat to japanese tanks

Not quite.  I cant imagine the 33mm frontal armor of the type 95 or type 97 would be harmed by MG fire.  I'll do more reading into the matter.  BTW, the Type 97 would be the best Japaese tank to add, most numerous and most capable tank they had.  57mm gun, a pair of 7.7mm MG's, 23mph, and lightly armored.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Crash Orange

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
Re: New Panther Tank
« Reply #154 on: December 06, 2010, 02:07:20 PM »
A question is, "Do you think they will add Japanese tanks in AH?".  I honestly do not see why not, seeing as they did use them, even if their armor was a bit on the thin side. 

Why not? IMO, for the same reason as we won't see flamethrower tanks or the Churchill AVRE... cool ideas but they just don't fit into the framework of the game. Almost all the Japanese tanks that saw action were light tanks that were neither designed nor used for slugging it out with enemy medium and heavy tanks.

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: New Panther Tank
« Reply #155 on: December 06, 2010, 02:18:53 PM »
Not quite.  I cant imagine the 33mm frontal armor of the type 95 or type 97 would be harmed by MG fire.  I'll do more reading into the matter.  BTW, the Type 97 would be the best Japanese tank to add, most numerous and most capable tank they had.  57mm gun, a pair of 7.7mm MG's, 23mph, and lightly armored.
true the front wouldn't be the problem, how much side,back and top armour does the tank have though?
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline DERK13

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: New Panther Tank
« Reply #156 on: December 06, 2010, 02:21:46 PM »
just cant wait to dive bomb this thing heheheee!

RedTail
 

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6166
Re: New Panther Tank
« Reply #157 on: December 06, 2010, 03:01:36 PM »
true the front wouldn't be the problem, how much side,back and top armour does the tank have though?

The Type 95 "Ha-Go" had 12mm on both side/rear of turret and hull sides, and 9mm on top and rear of hull.

The Type 97 ""Chi-Ha" had 20-26mm throughout the sides and read of the turret and hull.   
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: New Panther Tank
« Reply #158 on: December 07, 2010, 03:08:46 AM »
so...whens the m1 abrams being put in?  :noid :bolt: