Author Topic: 109T  (Read 1752 times)

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10641
109T
« on: August 15, 2012, 04:17:32 PM »
I could not find any information on the skins forum on the 109T being skinned & substituted for an E model.

Would that be acceptable to do?
Thoughts on that as I found this particular aircraft.





http://www.ecpmod.com/Articles/article57.html


Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: 109T
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2012, 08:47:29 PM »
I would say  :aok   :aok but some would think my opinion was biased...    :noid
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 109T
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2012, 10:06:42 PM »
Nope. The T-1 was definitely different and flew very different. The T-2 in limited numbers was much more like the E-7N or E-7Z. It doesn't fit the E-4 we have in-game.

I think it's been discussed a few times over the years, yes.

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7321
Re: 109T
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2012, 12:12:59 PM »
extanded wingtips for extra lift, and a leading edge spoiler.  :)
JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube+Twitch - 20Dolby10


"BE a man and shoot me in the back" - pez

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 109T
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2012, 10:45:33 PM »
Spoiler wasn't leading edge. That's the slots. The spoilers were on top of the wing to aid in carrier landings. Seeing as the small number of long-wing 109Ts that saw service had most of the naval gear removed, I imagine these spoilers were removed as well.

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9012
Re: 109T
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2012, 11:58:12 PM »
Spoiler wasn't leading edge. That's the slots. The spoilers were on top of the wing to aid in carrier landings. Seeing as the small number of long-wing 109Ts that saw service had most of the naval gear removed, I imagine these spoilers were removed as well.
minor correction: its "slats" not "slots".
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 109T
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2012, 12:47:22 AM »
I think slots is correct... as they do not droop so much as extend straight forward. Slats are like leading-edge flaps, no?

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9012
Re: 109T
« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2012, 01:01:24 AM »
I think slots is correct... as they do not droop so much as extend straight forward. Slats are like leading-edge flaps, no?
A slot has a gap between it and the main wing. See the wings of a Storch. A slat extends forward while maintaining contact with the wing over its entire length. See Bf109.
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 109T
« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2012, 01:08:04 AM »
I suppose you're right. Point taken.

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7321
Re: 109T
« Reply #9 on: August 17, 2012, 05:36:09 AM »
Goodness me you guys are terrible nit pickers  :lol
JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube+Twitch - 20Dolby10


"BE a man and shoot me in the back" - pez

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5937
Re: 109T
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2012, 12:15:29 PM »
Goodness me you guys are terrible nit pickers  :lol

Here's a pic I found over at NASA to help you keep it straight:



   ;)



"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline Nathan60

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4573
Re: 109T
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2012, 05:08:43 PM »
Here's a pic I found over at NASA to help you keep it straight:

(Image removed from quote.)

   ;)



yeah but where is the slot?
HamHawk
Wing III-- Pigs on The Wing
FSO--JG54
CHUGGA-CHUGGA, CHOO-CHOO
Pigs go wing deep

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 109T
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2012, 09:16:19 PM »
A slat extends surface area, thus changing how the airflow acts around the surface and delaying stall. A SLOT specifically channels airflow from beneath the wing to above the wing, increasing airflow above wing and delaying negative stall handling. That's not to say all slats must be airtight, but their main benefit is changing the incidence of the leading edge so that you create more lift. Slots don't do that.

The way Messerschmitt leading edge panels work is to specifically channel air. They do not droop much (an inch or two) but they extend well forward of the wing to create this channel.

To me that's much more of a slot, than a slat.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: 109T
« Reply #13 on: October 12, 2012, 12:37:19 AM »
"Messerschmitt Bf-109 A-E, Develpment, Testing, Production" by Willy Radinger and Walter Schick refers to them as "slats" for what it's worth :)

And should HTC ever decide to update the 109E and add the E7, I'll change my name to Von Corky and fly Luftwaffe! :)

Best looking of the 109s without a doubt :aok
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 109T
« Reply #14 on: October 12, 2012, 01:00:30 AM »
I would love HTC to add a "trop filter" to the hangar, as well! Simply cosmetic, I think the E-4, E-7, F-4, and G-2 look best with the sand filter on the supercharger intake! Especially the square ones on the E's!