Author Topic: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...  (Read 1558 times)

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23872
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #45 on: December 09, 2011, 04:47:02 PM »

I think level bombers should be rewarded for killing towns and I think also (reluctantly) hangers. But not GV's (if they are even rewarded for killing GV's)


That's the status quo.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #46 on: December 09, 2011, 07:53:05 PM »

I'm afraid you have to explain that one to me... :)

If there's no buffs to drop the hangers then the hoarde will multiply to ineptly do so with attack planes.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23872
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #47 on: December 09, 2011, 08:23:45 PM »
If there's no buffs to drop the hangers

 :huh

Did I mention such a thing?
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline FiLtH

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6448
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #48 on: December 09, 2011, 09:11:47 PM »
if it aint broke, dont fix it


   I thought it was broke.

~AoM~

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13182
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #49 on: December 10, 2011, 04:58:58 AM »
In regards to Lanc stuka's anyone bailing because they don't want to land should be penalised with a -300 perk point deduction.
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23872
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #50 on: December 10, 2011, 05:13:34 AM »
(...) bailing because they don't want to land should (...)


Now you only have to find a way for the program to identify a players intents and motivations... ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4486
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #51 on: December 10, 2011, 05:44:18 AM »
In regards to Lanc stuka's anyone bailing because they don't want to land should be penalised with a -300 perk point deduction.
Thats wrong in that way.
People may have to shut down AH for various reasons. Does it mean they lose 300 perks?
My internet is crappy, i used to disconnect in every second-third hour. Does it mean i should have lost 300 pers with every single disconnect?

While i agree bomb and bail is super lame, i dont think a perk penality can solve it at all. Just increase the proxy range, for example.
AoM
City of ice

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13182
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #52 on: December 10, 2011, 05:59:20 AM »
I agree you should have 400 perk  points deducted :)
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4486
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #53 on: December 10, 2011, 06:05:21 AM »
come on trollio, try harder
AoM
City of ice

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13182
Re: Strategic vs tactical: Just an idea...
« Reply #54 on: December 10, 2011, 06:56:40 AM »
 :rofl

I have a hangover :)
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario