Author Topic: A-26  (Read 1403 times)

Offline Old Sport

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 530
Re: A-26
« Reply #15 on: May 03, 2013, 08:35:52 AM »
Earl, for what it's worth, I understood your above comments about flying the B-26C Douglas Invader and am surprised that others have such a tough time of comprehension. I also suspect that your comments about the Martin Marauder were based on what pilots experienced, not the accumulated combat record.

Quote
After entering service with the U.S. Army, the aircraft received the reputation of a "Widowmaker" due to the early models' high rate of accidents during takeoff and landings. The Marauder had to be flown at exact airspeeds, particularly on final approach and when one engine was out. The 150 mph (241 km/h) speed on short final was intimidating to pilots who were used to much slower speeds, and whenever they slowed down below what the manual stated the aircraft would stall and crash. Ethell

I for one would be glad to read any anecdotes about the Douglas B-26 that you'd care to share.

Best.

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3993
Re: A-26
« Reply #16 on: May 03, 2013, 09:07:49 AM »
I'll take the a26 after as the Beau has a bigger shoe in history for WW2.
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: A-26
« Reply #17 on: May 03, 2013, 01:59:25 PM »
No.  This is the obvious next "gamey" choice for the arcade gamers.   ;)

The A26 is #42 on the "to add" list.  It is far behind the DB-3, Pe-2, IL-4, Beaufighter, D520, MiG-3, Wellington, and a number of gv's.  Oh, and it is even lower on the list than HTC adding a winter and desert map.   :aok

Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3993
Re: A-26
« Reply #18 on: May 03, 2013, 02:02:11 PM »
No.  This is the obvious next "gamey" choice for the arcade gamers.   ;)

The A26 is #42 on the "to add" list.  It is far behind the DB-3, Pe-2, IL-4, Beaufighter, D520, MiG-3, Wellington, and a number of gv's.  Oh, and it is even lower on the list than HTC adding a winter and desert map.   :aok



bah, yak is poo, but I'll duke it out with my 190. But those maps, really like the idea of a winter map.
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: A-26
« Reply #19 on: May 03, 2013, 02:48:19 PM »
Earl, for what it's worth, I understood your above comments about flying the B-26C Douglas Invader and am surprised that others have such a tough time of comprehension. I also suspect that your comments about the Martin Marauder were based on what pilots experienced, not the accumulated combat record.

I for one would be glad to read any anecdotes about the Douglas B-26 that you'd care to share.

Best.
:airplane: Of course, in talking to some of the "ole" guys, when I was in, as you pointed out in your post, the landing speeds and VMC, with one engine out was very high. But, when Harry Truman, then a Senator I think, threaten to pull the Martin contract, they redesigned the wing and came up with a pretty good overall wing performance for the ole bird. If I remember correctly, the VMC, with one engine inop on the Douglas B-26C, with the dash 67 engine was 124 at sea level and of course, higher for non-standard temp and altitude. Good handling thoughout the slow speed realms with one engine inop, (we used 12" MP to simulate engine out), and you still had a little rudder left at minimum speed. In climbing 60 degree banked turns with military power, departure stall recovering procedures, turns to right were no problem because of torque and "P" factor of the high side engine, (left), but you had to be very careful in turns to the left. I never snap rolled one, but I talked to guys who did, (not on purpose), and they said about 1 and 1/2 turns before full recovery. Minimum altitude AGL for stall training and procedures was 8,000 feet. It had a large rudder and was very effective, just like the 29 and the trick was, as soon as elevator started shaking, start recovery procedures, which consisted of lowering nose and leveling wing and flying out of the approach to the stall. Power off, or approach to landing stalls were a snap as it was very stable and just a little back pressure release on the elevator and the ole bird would start flying again. It had no tendicey to break one way or the other during normal approach to landing stalls.
Of course you all ways had that instructor, who after you have set up a good approach and almost at point of touch down, would announce "go around", then things sometimes would get exciting real quick! Full Power, gear up flaps to 30%, level flight to gain flying speed to VMC speed, then they would reduce one engine or other to 12" MP and you would have to do a go a round for a single engine approach. As long as you stayed focused, really was no problem, but if you came back with dry hands, you were really a "cool" cat.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2013, 02:50:43 PM by earl1937 »
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!