Author Topic: Control of a destroyer  (Read 7563 times)

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7314
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #90 on: July 26, 2016, 12:14:32 PM »
I see what you're getting at bustr. Submarines are a shoe in but they hunted in wolfpacks. So all we need to do is add destroyers and hunt in wolfpacks too. Nice idea!  :aok
Uboats! I love Silent Hunter


JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube+Twitch - 20Dolby10


"BE a man and shoot me in the back" - pez

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #91 on: July 26, 2016, 12:49:48 PM »
When we were in the closed alpha, we had months where our vehicles would fall through into the underworld in different random spots. The underworld is water with land floating on top. You could sit there in your M3, often upside down, and realize it could be skinned like a sub and you would believe you were in a submarine.

I think it is still possible if you go into the new town in the beta and drive your vehicle into one of the ponds. Not sure if Hitech fixed it for those ponds yet. You can also try offline with the beta CraterMA spawning a GV on the CV deck and driving off. I tested it a few patches ago to see what would happen when my GV dropped 20ft into water off the road in the town.
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline 68EZPkns

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 97
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #92 on: July 26, 2016, 01:11:44 PM »
Another job the DDs had was laying smoke screens. If you wanted to tag along with a TF you could scout out ahead and look for enemy fleets or PTs and DDs. Laying smoke screens was common practice for DDs when confronted with bigger ships. Also Fletcher class DDs had radar. They were used to create a picket line around the CVs watching for Kamakazis.

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #93 on: July 28, 2016, 05:16:07 PM »
Adding the ability to spawn a DD to the game today would be relatively easy. Use the code for the PT boat, with changes to the parameters that control its behavior within the physics engine. Aiming the torps would be a little more challenging without the addition of some sort of torpedo aiming optics or TDC, but our player base seems to be very adept at adapting to such challenges. So, from a technical viewpoint, it's entirely do-able. Assertions have been made that it would be too vulnerable to air attack, and that it would take too long to get where it's needed, given the current game environment. Interestingly enough, I recall the biggest objections to this idea in the past was that player control-able DDs would be too powerful, rather than them being too vulnerable. Imagine the impact if a half-dozen players at a port upped DDs right at the doc. So, clearly availability would have to be limited, somehow. Taking each of these in turn...

Survivability – Three primary factors are at work here: Toughness, agility, and defensive firepower. While it’s true that one skilled player with a couple 1k lb bombs can easily sink the DDs escorting the fleet, it’s still way more durable than a PT. Strafing one to death would take a lot more ammo, and multiple runs, increasing the likelihood that defensive fire would take down the attacker. Now, a player controlled DD would not simply plod along in a straight line at constant speed. Level bombing would be much more unlikely to be affective against a maneuvering DD. Dive bombing would be your best bet, but not all players are that skilled at it, particularly when the target is zigging and zagging at high speed. Add to that the high volume of defensive fire, and I don’t believe it would be all that easy for your average player to get bomb hits. Even then, it would still take more than a single 1k lb bomb to sink one. Plus, with the 5-in guns firing in AA mode, an aircraft has to fight through proximity-fused AAA for several miles just to get close enough to make an attack. So, a single attacker is by no means guaranteed to succeed.

Transit Time – Even at a DDs max speed, which is not much higher than the CV fleets travel at, there are some maps where it would take considerable time to get from one place to another. The Obvious answer, without major code work required, are spawn points, same as we have for PTs. Another idea would be to create a new type of fleet we’ll call a Destroyer Squadron (DS). This is similar to idea HiTech has floated (pun intended) for submarine ops, i.e. a moving fleet type called the “Wolfpack”, which could be directed around the map just like a fleet, and would act as a spawn point for subs. In the case of a DS, it would be represented by 4 to six destroyers (so it can be targeted and destroyed, just like the CV fleets), which would be able to spawn only DDs, PTs and perhaps LVTs. It would have its own auto defensive fire capability (i.e. auto-ack).

Uber Boat – Let’s face it…a Fletcher class DD has a lot of fire power for a player controlled unit, and could unbalance the game in certain scenarios. Nerf it too much, and it becomes useless, on the other hand. One obvious way to restrict its use is by perking it (what else do you have to spend boat perks on). If you could also earn perks by manning ship guns, those could then be used to grab a DD. Another idea (requiring code changes) would be to limit the number available to each country; once one is sunk, a “cool-down” period of, say 10 minutes, would have to pass before it could re-spawn.

Just some thoughts on how this might fit into our game world…


Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."

Offline 68EZPkns

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 97
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #94 on: July 29, 2016, 01:07:20 PM »
Adding the ability to spawn a DD to the game today would be relatively easy. Use the code for the PT boat, with changes to the parameters that control its behavior within the physics engine. Aiming the torps would be a little more challenging without the addition of some sort of torpedo aiming optics or TDC, but our player base seems to be very adept at adapting to such challenges. So, from a technical viewpoint, it's entirely do-able. Assertions have been made that it would be too vulnerable to air attack, and that it would take too long to get where it's needed, given the current game environment. Interestingly enough, I recall the biggest objections to this idea in the past was that player control-able DDs would be too powerful, rather than them being too vulnerable. Imagine the impact if a half-dozen players at a port upped DDs right at the doc. So, clearly availability would have to be limited, somehow. Taking each of these in turn...

Survivability – Three primary factors are at work here: Toughness, agility, and defensive firepower. While it’s true that one skilled player with a couple 1k lb bombs can easily sink the DDs escorting the fleet, it’s still way more durable than a PT. Strafing one to death would take a lot more ammo, and multiple runs, increasing the likelihood that defensive fire would take down the attacker. Now, a player controlled DD would not simply plod along in a straight line at constant speed. Level bombing would be much more unlikely to be affective against a maneuvering DD. Dive bombing would be your best bet, but not all players are that skilled at it, particularly when the target is zigging and zagging at high speed. Add to that the high volume of defensive fire, and I don’t believe it would be all that easy for your average player to get bomb hits. Even then, it would still take more than a single 1k lb bomb to sink one. Plus, with the 5-in guns firing in AA mode, an aircraft has to fight through proximity-fused AAA for several miles just to get close enough to make an attack. So, a single attacker is by no means guaranteed to succeed.

Transit Time – Even at a DDs max speed, which is not much higher than the CV fleets travel at, there are some maps where it would take considerable time to get from one place to another. The Obvious answer, without major code work required, are spawn points, same as we have for PTs. Another idea would be to create a new type of fleet we’ll call a Destroyer Squadron (DS). This is similar to idea HiTech has floated (pun intended) for submarine ops, i.e. a moving fleet type called the “Wolfpack”, which could be directed around the map just like a fleet, and would act as a spawn point for subs. In the case of a DS, it would be represented by 4 to six destroyers (so it can be targeted and destroyed, just like the CV fleets), which would be able to spawn only DDs, PTs and perhaps LVTs. It would have its own auto defensive fire capability (i.e. auto-ack).

Uber Boat – Let’s face it…a Fletcher class DD has a lot of fire power for a player controlled unit, and could unbalance the game in certain scenarios. Nerf it too much, and it becomes useless, on the other hand. One obvious way to restrict its use is by perking it (what else do you have to spend boat perks on). If you could also earn perks by manning ship guns, those could then be used to grab a DD. Another idea (requiring code changes) would be to limit the number available to each country; once one is sunk, a “cool-down” period of, say 10 minutes, would have to pass before it could re-spawn.

Just some thoughts on how this might fit into our game world…

Nice post! +100, hopefully one day we will get player controlled ships.

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #95 on: August 02, 2016, 12:55:29 PM »
Nice post! +100, hopefully one day we will get player controlled ships.

Thanks, 68EXPkns. I hope so, too. Used to play a table-top wargame called "Battlewagon". Always thought it would be fun to do something similar within AH.
Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7257
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #96 on: August 02, 2016, 07:12:29 PM »

Please excuse Fork.  He is an Epsilon-minus semi-moron, who of course cannot grasp the overall concepts of this game.  No matter how many years he spends here, no matter how much time he has devoted as a staff member, he simply is incapable of understanding the basic functions of tactics and strategy, not to mention how things like boats could work in this game.  I apologize on his behalf, and I will try to ensure that his wife gives him his shot before she lets him near the computer from now on.

- oldman
hey, hey.  OM. Hey. (hic)
I never mix my shoes with my ford posting, (hic) I mean my food and shoes sorting, (hic), I mean my booze and forum (hic) postings. Yeah. That.
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline Chilli

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #97 on: August 03, 2016, 03:09:03 PM »
Fork that's a classic  :rofl  You were a little rough on Oldman though, I thought he was quite capable of understanding the more you twist the rubber band, the faster and longer the propellor spins. 

Offline 68EZPkns

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 97
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #98 on: August 04, 2016, 01:16:51 PM »
I used to have a game called "Great Naval Battles of the Pacific" by SSI. Loved it.

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
Re: Control of a destroyer
« Reply #99 on: August 05, 2016, 10:46:48 AM »
Yeah, do believe I recall that game, too, 68EXPkns.
Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."