Author Topic: ANOTHER STRIKE AGAINST VIRTUAL "REALITY'  (Read 899 times)

Offline RODBUSTR

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 473
ANOTHER STRIKE AGAINST VIRTUAL "REALITY'
« on: August 24, 2017, 03:21:25 PM »
   Using a hog for cv cap, rolling in on an Arado ar234,  Overtaking him in a good dive, and The At, ignites the RATO.    I guess some don't realize what the acronym is...I'm pretty sure that the RATO pods would not stay put at 460mph. and what about the drag...laughable though.   I guess it deserves the dancin' banana. :banana: :banana: :banana:

Offline ImADot

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6215
Re: ANOTHER STRIKE AGAINST VIRTUAL "REALITY'
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2017, 03:22:46 PM »
Is it possible for you to not use all caps in your titles? It's really annoying.
My Current Rig:
GigaByte GA-X99-UD4 Mobo w/ 16Gb RAM
Intel i7 5820k, Win7 64-bit
NVidia GTX 970 4Gb ACX 2.0
Track IR, CH Fighterstick, CH Pro Throttle, CH Pro Pedals

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: ANOTHER STRIKE AGAINST VIRTUAL "REALITY'
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2017, 03:30:00 PM »
Much ado about nothing.
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: ANOTHER STRIKE AGAINST VIRTUAL "REALITY'
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2017, 03:35:49 PM »
Rod, the drag is in fact modeled. And the weight. If you KEEP them you suffer quite a bit taking off and actually climbing out. They keep them like that to use as a novelty like you mentioned, getting away from a target. Not overly historic, but then neither is bombing CVs in Ar234s, eh? The item itself and its execution and modelling is correct, and we use it how we like. You could nose down and ignite them when facing the ground, if you liked. Technically that would work in reality too -- you'd just not get a respawn like in this game.

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4227
Re: ANOTHER STRIKE AGAINST VIRTUAL "REALITY'
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2017, 04:18:56 PM »
It does seem like they should drop off even if you did not use them in the AH model.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: ANOTHER STRIKE AGAINST VIRTUAL "REALITY'
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2017, 04:23:40 PM »
They didn't drop off until you triggered them and then they ran dry. That's how it was in WW2. The only difference was in WW2 they used them immediately on takeoff.


I, myself, preferred to take off with them on, but use them once I was leveled out and gear up to get up to altitude faster. I have, for kicks and grins, saved them for a NOE escape from a carrier that I was bombing, but that's risky as well.

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11617
      • Trainer's Website
Re: ANOTHER STRIKE AGAINST VIRTUAL "REALITY'
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2017, 05:06:33 PM »
It does seem like they should drop off even if you did not use them in the AH model.


You think the drag is more stress than the thrust?

Offline Canspec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 896
Re: ANOTHER STRIKE AGAINST VIRTUAL "REALITY'
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2017, 07:41:38 PM »
You can also weld a couple to the top of your car and light them off to test the real thrust to drag ratio...........I'm sure your cars brakes could handle it...... :old:
Gnat       

GFC, AOM, The Few

The Kommando for FSO