Author Topic: some boring numbers on this PTO setup  (Read 436 times)

Offline keyapaha

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
some boring numbers on this PTO setup
« on: September 16, 2002, 11:24:23 AM »
was just killing some time here at work thought i would compare some numbers on the fighters in this set.

 these are very interesting

  a6m2 vs f4f4    a6m2 kills 2/4 deaths
            vs f4u1                   1/4 deaths
            vs f6f5                    8/14 deaths
            vs p47                    0/4  deaths
            vs p51                    1/3 deaths

 a6m5  vs f4f4   a6m5 kills 26/32 deaths
            vs f4u1                  24/23 deaths
            vs f6f5                   50/62 deaths
            vs p40e                  7/0    deaths
            vs p47                  25/27  deaths
            vs p51                  43/42  deaths

 ki61    vs f4f4   ki61 kills    6/6    deaths
           vs f4u1                   7/8     deaths
           vs f6f5                  28/47   deaths
           vs p40e                  2/1     deaths
           vs p47                    7/9     deaths
           vs p51                  17/9     deaths

 n1k2  vs f4f4   n1k2 kills 18/8     deaths
           vs f4u1                 11/8     deaths
           vs f6f5                  76/40   deaths
           vs p40e                 6/4      deaths
           vs p47                   8/4      deaths
           vs p51                 22/8      deaths


  total kills by japanese planes 395  american losses 367

Offline ergRTC

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1632
      • http://bio2.elmira.edu/DMS/index.pl?table=content&faculty=1&page=1
some boring numbers on this PTO setup
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2002, 02:41:11 PM »
havent been able to fly this one yet, but after reading all those whines, it looks to me like the dweebs are flying the 51s.  

Isnt it always like this?  Get an uber plane like that in a scenario and the chute shooting, diaper wearing, pock faced little morons in the MA come crawling to try and get a kill?  Looks like the IJN have been spanking the twirps to me.

In fact besides the terrible luck of the 51 pilots, things look as they should in those stats.  Too bad about the p40e.  

erg

Offline keyapaha

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
some boring numbers on this PTO setup
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2002, 03:35:13 PM »
your right pretty much equal with the excption of the n1k2 holding a 2to1 adv. in k/d ratio

  which is to be expected

  even my personal numbers arenot all that bad

  a6m2  2/5
  a6m5  3/6
  ki61    1/3
  ki67    1/0
  n1k2   1/3
  p51b   1/0

 i guess when your out numbered 2 and 3 to 1 all seems bad :)
« Last Edit: September 16, 2002, 03:43:11 PM by keyapaha »

Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6558
      • Aces High Events
some boring numbers on this PTO setup
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2002, 07:39:55 PM »
Yeah things are always worse when you're outnumbered. :)  The IJN are holding up fairly well againts the faster allied planes of this setup.   While it's true that if the #'s are anywhere near even I fly allied, I have spend some stick time flying axis with 4 of my squaddies this sunday trying to even the playing field a little and did fairly well with 14 kills in the A6M5B vs 4 deaths.  Dealing with the p47's and p51's isn't all that bad unless you're getting ganged... sooner or later in a fight they're gonna slow down enough so you can get 'em. :)
80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.