Author Topic: RAF Aircrafts  (Read 1154 times)

Offline HeLLcAt

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
      • http://www.myspace.com/xiZm04
Superfly Read Please
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2002, 09:19:45 AM »
Yes, the gun are inverted and the M & the RF on the plane are inverted. Maybe Superfly could check this out! :)

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
RAF Aircrafts
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2002, 10:03:07 AM »
Nicely done!

Offline Blade

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 528
      • Battoutai
RAF Aircrafts
« Reply #17 on: September 28, 2002, 04:27:20 PM »
I want rear view mirror and C-wing-----

I think Gun and Cannon position  are due to Wing type.
(C-wing or E-wing)
AHs Spitfire has only E-wing but support C-wings armament
(AH support C-wings armament only 20mmx2 & 0.303x4)

And AHs RF-M based on this decal, but I thougt its mistake.



#Sorry Im not good at English....
---------------------------
Who Dares Wins
---------------------------
抜刀隊Blog http://battoutai.blogspot.com
Aces High Wiki Plus! http://www43.atwiki.jp/aceshigh/

Offline mipoikel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3521
      • http://www.llv32.org
Re: AH Spit14 vs Real Spit14
« Reply #18 on: September 29, 2002, 03:26:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mitsu


You can notice AH spit 14 is best...;)



I dont know words to say this but Ill try. There is something in the nose over engine in real spit what AH spit dont have. Whats that? Like 2 mg's or something??
I am a spy!

Offline sutpid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 231
RAF Aircrafts
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2002, 11:16:45 AM »
also the gun postion is switched

Offline Epsilon 5

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
RAF Aircrafts
« Reply #20 on: September 29, 2002, 01:04:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by sutpid
also the gun postion is switched


already said that

Offline whgates3

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
Re: Re: AH Spit14 vs Real Spit14
« Reply #21 on: September 29, 2002, 03:30:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by mipoikel

I dont know words to say this but Ill try. There is something in the nose over engine in real spit what AH spit dont have. Whats that? Like 2 mg's or something??


looks like some sort of air intake. also the hump on the wing from the cannon in the RL pic doesn't seem to be in the AH pic & the hump on the wing from the tyre in AH doesn't seem to be in the RL pic & the white stripe around the rear fuselage (the one that denotes RAF home defense squadron i think, but forgot exactly what it means - anyone know?) is a bit closer to the tail in the RL pic. the RL pics show 3 tone camo pattern, AH is two tone, AH animated prop seems to be 5 bladed, but parked it is 4 bladed...anything else (however minor obviously - lol)?

Offline loser

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1642
RAF Aircrafts
« Reply #22 on: October 03, 2002, 07:28:21 PM »
sweet!

oh mitsu, it is "august", not augast.

Offline vorticon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7935
RAF Aircrafts
« Reply #23 on: October 03, 2002, 08:17:12 PM »
kinda brings a tear to the eye and makes one DAMN proud to fly RAF aircraft with those excellent pics and music (specially the hurricane mk 2 c [personal fav.])

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
RAF Aircrafts
« Reply #24 on: October 03, 2002, 11:32:10 PM »
The bulges on the nose of the Spitfire Mk XIV in the photo are the coverings for the cam shafts.  The Griffon is a bigger engine than thw Merlin and the nose of the Spit had to be reshaped to accomodate it.

If you look at the AH Spitfire Mk XIV the cam covers are represented by 2D textures.  They really need to be part of the 3D model though.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-