Author Topic: B-24 liberator (Read 402 times)

Citabria · « **on:** July 13, 2003, 07:57:20 PM »

is one of these in the works for ah2?
its my favorite plane because its so ugly

AHGOD · « **Reply #1 on:** July 13, 2003, 07:58:30 PM »

That is all we need is more american bombers. How bout asking for JP or SU or IT stuff first?

Citabria · « **Reply #2 on:** July 13, 2003, 08:52:35 PM »

because everyone elses bombers were crappy.

only the us used bombers en mass in daylight throughout the war.

no other countries buffs carried as much ordnance or defenses.

Estes · « **Reply #3 on:** July 13, 2003, 08:59:19 PM »

I agree on the b-24.

muckmaw · « **Reply #4 on:** July 13, 2003, 09:09:33 PM »

As much as I like American Heavies...why bother with the B-24?

Great plane. Nice to add to the set. Would help with immersion, but the 17 can do everything the 24 can, can't it?

Why not add the B-29 first?

AHGOD · « **Reply #5 on:** July 13, 2003, 09:14:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Citabria
because everyone elses bombers were crappy.

only the us used bombers en mass in daylight throughout the war.

no other countries buffs carried as much ordnance or defenses.

Wrong. Just because they flew in daylight doesn't make them the best. The brits bombers were equally as good. And btw the brit buffs carried more ords

mia389 · « **Reply #6 on:** July 13, 2003, 09:41:23 PM »

This been up before I know. I would love to see it though.

Ike 2K# · « **Reply #7 on:** July 13, 2003, 10:20:56 PM »

bring on the G4M with "Ohka" manned flying bomb. Its good for destroying bomber formations and carriers.

davidpt40 · « **Reply #8 on:** July 13, 2003, 10:43:27 PM »

B24 cruised faster, had longer range, and carried more bombs than B17.

What AH really needs is a B25. A20 is ok, but it has puny nose guns compared to B25H. 8 .50s, 75mm cannon, rockets, and bombs.

Bullethead · « **Reply #9 on:** July 13, 2003, 11:15:31 PM »

The B24 was built in larger numbers than the B17 and, IIRC, any other US plane. So you'd think it would be in AH, especially because AH, at least originally, was into doing planes unmodeled by other games. OTOH, it's kinda moot now since we already have the B17.

Saurdaukar · « **Reply #10 on:** July 14, 2003, 01:01:49 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ike 2K#
bring on the G4M with "Ohka" manned flying bomb. Its good for destroying bomber formations and carriers.

We already have plenty of suicide dweebs. No need to give them a plane built for it.

Bodhi · « **Reply #11 on:** July 14, 2003, 07:38:50 AM »

G4M is a great idea, the Pe-2 and maybe the He111 and the Do-17. As for any Italian stuff, kinda a moot point, it was fairly worthles. The B-24 should be added as should the B-25 and the B-29 (no nukes though). As for a "Flying Bomb" I agree with Mazz, too many idgits intent on suicide as it is, why aid that behavior.

Just my opinion though.

daddog · « **Reply #12 on:** July 14, 2003, 08:39:53 AM »

------------------------
CO daddog
332nd Flying Mongrels
Roster
Events!
Noses in the wind since 1997.

A wise man gets more use from his enemies than a fool from his friends. - Baltasar Gracian

Biggles · « **Reply #13 on:** July 14, 2003, 11:08:49 AM »

I think the B-24 would make an excellent addition. Would much prefer to fly it than to fly a Blenheim.

My dad flew 24's out of New Guinea.

Reschke · « **Reply #14 on:** July 14, 2003, 11:47:21 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by daddog

------------------------

You too Daddog I would love to see that bird in my USN gunsight very soon indeed and not in TR like I do now on occasion.