Anne Coulter.... Liar

[AKIron]

Originally posted by midnight Target
OK, let's start over, and I'll type really slow.

1. She claims as a fact that a kid was disciplined for simply bowing his head.... not a fact at all, but a claim by the kids parents in a lawsuit.... may not even be true.... LIE.

2. She claims that liberal policies led to the cost of the Marshall plan.... uhh no. It was a determination that we wanted to spend the money to stop communism from spreading into western europe. Hardly a fact. In fact, a LIE.

3. The NYTimes "quotes". Do I need to spell out how insidious her claims are? Its as if I were to quote Anne as saying "Liberals suck", then someone on this board claiming MT said "Liberals Suck". It was right there in his post.

3 for 3      You guys need to try harder.

I'll type even      s        l        o        w        e        r

1. She believes the parents. The parents haven't been disproven. Not a lie.

2. She was comparing the rejuvenation of Japan with Europe (more specifically Germany). Britian's socialization was but one factor among many she cited that made for much expense, effort, and time in rebuilding and normalizing. Which of these exactly is a lie? That it took much money and time or that Britian was socializing? I see no lie here.

3. Ah, if your third debunk was that liberals don't suck we have  to look only so far as your past beloved leader's concubine. Ya gotta admit this one.

[midnight Target]

Originally posted by AKIron
I'll type even      s        l        o        w        e        r

1. She believes the parents. The parents haven't been disproven. Not a lie.

2. She was comparing the rejuvenation of Japan with Europe (more specifically Germany). Britian's socialization was but one factor among many she cited that made for much expense, effort, and time in rebuilding and normalizing. Which of these exactly is a lie? That it took much money and time or that Britian was socializing? I see no lie here.

3. Ah, if your third debunk was that liberals don't suck we have  to look only so far as your past beloved leader's concubine. Ya gotta admit this one.

1. So it is a fact? Hardly.... a Lie.
2. She mentions a lot of factors, but her exact words are..."The British made Germany's war-torn economy worse by trying to impose socialism in their zone (as well as in their country). Predictably, economic disaster ensued. Over the next five years, the U.S. was required to spend the equivalent of about $200 billion"
Don't try to sugar coat it, she is a lying skank.
3. You missed the point completely on that one. You may want to reread the first post.

[AKIron]

I don't recall her saying it was a 'fact'. You like to quote her, especially out of context, where did she say it was a fact?

I was making a joke about number 3, since you didn't post a link and I'm not real sure what the hell you meant.

[Thrawn]

Originally posted by AKIron
1. She believes the parents. The parents haven't been disproven. Not a lie.

The case was three years ago and it was dropped a week later by the parents, without explanation.

"Religious Right Group Drops Texas Bible Lawsuit

A Religious Right legal group that accused a Texas public school teacher of throwing two students’ Bibles in the trash abruptly withdrew its lawsuit only 13 days after it was filed.

Controversy flared in May, when two Texas middle school students, Angela and Amber Harbison, claimed that a teacher confiscated their Bibles, called the religious texts “garbage” and threw them in the trash. Another student asserted that he was ordered to remove a book cover featuring the Ten Commandments. With assistance from the Orlando, Fla.-based Liberty Counsel, the three students and their parents filed suit on May 19 against the Willis Independent School District.

The case quickly became fodder for Religious Right leaders who claim that public schools are hostile toward religion. As Jerry Falwell told supporters in the June 1 edition of his Falwell Confidential, “Leftists who hate the Judeo-Christian heritage of our nation are constantly attempting to discover new ways to ignore and neglect that history. As a result, students of faith are frequently targeted and persecuted for even the most simple expression of their faith. These brave young students are the martyrs of our day.”

But now it appears that the incidents may have never happened. On June 1, Liberty Counsel attorneys dropped the suit without public explanation. The announcement was welcome news to school officials, who maintained that the charges were inaccurate.

“The district has always maintained that the allegations contained in the suit were untrue,” read a statement released by the school district. “Students of Willis Independent School District have not been told they cannot bring Bibles to school, and Bibles were never confiscated or thrown into the trash.... The allegations contained in this lawsuit are totally inconsistent with the actions of this school district and its employees.”


This lie by Coulter was completely debunked on AGW here.

http://agw.warbirdsiii.com/bbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=24950




Coulter is a liar, and it baffles my mind that MT would give her this much air time.

[LoneStarBuckeye]

Originally posted by midnight Target
You keep saying that word... I do not think it means what you think it means.

I disagree with almost everything you write, but I can't help but like you when you post things like this!

[AKIron]

So, it's only true when decided by a court? No such thing as private settlements? You guys are establishing some shakey ground for yourselves here.

[MrLars]

Hoo boy, people defending Coulter now? Check this site out if you want to see how she uses lies, misdirection and out of context quotes in her piece of fiction "Slander".

http://slannder.homestead.com/files/slanndermain.html

Argue all ya want about the slant, left or right, of the site but read the content regardless for some info exposing how she twists history past and present to push her RW agenda.


Nothing new...happens from both sides of the isle.

[AKIron]

Originally posted by MrLars
Hoo boy, people defending Coulter now? Check this site out if you want to see how she uses lies, misdirection and out of context quotes in her piece of fiction "Slander".

http://slannder.homestead.com/files/slanndermain.html

Argue all ya want about the slant, left or right, of the site but read the content regardless for some info exposing how she twists history past and present to push her RW agenda.


Nothing new...happens from both sides of the isle.

I didn't even know who she was or what she looked 'till someone menioned her on this board a while back. Anyone that inspires the ire and hate of the liberals like she has automatically gets my attention if not admiration.

[Thrawn]

Originally posted by AKIron
So, it's only true when decided by a court? No such thing as private settlements? You guys are establishing some shakey ground for yourselves here.

Bull****.  There was not private settlement.  The case was withdrawn shortly after the investigation into it's veracity was started.  To state anything different is weak at best, dishonest at worse.  Unless you actual have some evidence or proof to put forth, or are you just talking out of your arse?  Much like a woman I'm familiar with by the last name of Coulter?  

[Tumor]

MT, this thread... your own words (unless I'm clearly mistaken) are one of the root problems I have with "The left".

How do you come to the conclusion that a disproven statement is a factual lie based on the statement of another disproven statement that includes the words "I think"?

Not that I give a crap about Ann, however given the choice of Ann or Al?... hmmmmm



Now, to take this a step further... I'd like to ask k2cok a question based on his description of Ann Coulter.  I gotta know this.  You think Janet Reno is hot dontcha...DONTCHA!!

[Hortlund]

Originally posted by Thrawn
Bull****.  There was not private settlement.  

Excuse me but what the hell do you know about that?

[AKIron]

Originally posted by Thrawn
Bull****.  There was not private settlement.  The case was withdrawn shortly after the investigation into it's veracity was started.  To state anything different is weak at best, dishonest at worse.  Unless you actual have some evidence or proof to put forth, or are you just talking out of your arse?  Much like a woman I'm familiar with by the last name of Coulter?  

You have a link or are you just talking out your prettythang?

[k2cok]

Now, to take this a step further... I'd like to ask k2cok a question based on his description of Ann Coulter. I gotta know this. You think Janet Reno is hot dontcha...DONTCHA!!

I wouldn't do either one of them, shemales are disgusting.  

[SaRCaP]

Whooooo go buckeyes!