The B-24 brings immersion. It was a major player in both the European and Pacific theaters. It was much more common than the B-17 in the Pacific. Running the Ploesti scenario without the B-24 is like running the BoB scenario without the Stuka or Ju-88.
Man ... I sure hate repeating myself but here I go again:
The main arena is no longer a factor when it comes to adding aircraft to Aces High. The main arena has all the aircraft it needs so it shouldn't even be a consideration anymore. Aircraft need to be added to the game to fill the gaps necessary to allow for historical setups without having to substitute a different model.
One more time, rephrased:
The main arena is no longer a practical factor when considering new models for Aces High. The main arena has pretty much all the uber models it needs and every side can fly any plane in the game. Now it's time to focus on historical setting gaps ... which has absolutely nothing to do with the main arena or how similar in role or ability one aircraft has with another. Especially if it involves an aircraft that served in a large capacity on all fronts.
Now if you're talking the B-29, it
would affect the MA .. in
one way and
one way alone - it would become
THE bomber
everyone uses. And although it, too, is a major player in the Pacific, it basically represents the end of the war ... with an atom bomb as an exclamation point. So you see .. adding something
different can take on a whole new connotation depending on what type of
addition you're looking at. The B-24 adds immersion and fills historical gaps ... appealing to players who enjoy historical settings. The B-29 adds a plane that is significantly different than any bomber in the game ... and flew in the war serving a significant role ... yet it's value to Aces High is actually diminished by the major
ability differences it possesses ... turning ability to
liability.
Why do I bother?