Author Topic: Aces High Weapons Compared  (Read 997 times)

Offline xHaMmeRx

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 402
      • http://www.netaces.org
Aces High Weapons Compared
« on: December 14, 2001, 06:48:00 PM »
It's a work in progress, but I've got most of the 20mm and .50cal done. Go to

www.netaces.org

and follow the link to "Aces High Weapon Performance".  There will be more after the holidays.

HaMmeR
netAces.org

Offline Raubvogel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3882
Aces High Weapons Compared
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2001, 06:56:00 PM »
Looks good. Can you do the Mg151/20 from a wing mount?

Offline akak

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 986
      • http://www.479thraiders.com
Aces High Weapons Compared
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2001, 01:37:00 AM »
Great site <S>

 
Quote
Originally posted by xHaMmeRx:
It's a work in progress, but I've got most of the 20mm and .50cal done. Go to

www.netaces.org

and follow the link to "Aces High Weapon Performance".  There will be more after the holidays.

HaMmeR
netAces.org

Offline bolillo_loco

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Aces High Weapons Compared
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2001, 02:13:00 PM »
thanks xHaMmeRx  interesting read.

Offline pbirmingham

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 201
      • http://bigscary.com
Aces High Weapons Compared
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2001, 05:33:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bolillo_loco:
thanks xHaMmeRx  interesting read.

Indeed.  Looks like every bit the equal of the great work Hammer did for AW.

I find it interesting that at d200, the bullet spread isn't terribly sensitive to your convergence settings -- setting close convergence hurts you at long range without helping much at closer range.

I will adjust accordingly.