Author Topic: Democrat runs as a Republican (Read 831 times)

Manedew · « **Reply #30 on:** August 03, 2005, 07:12:32 PM »

Are you sure you understand the diffrance between article and editoral?

And you vote for the Man's platform .... not the parties....

Like republican's always vote or run with a strick 'party' platform..... maybe the neocons do..... but some isn't all.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #31 on:** August 03, 2005, 07:16:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Manedew
Are you sure you understand the diffrance between article and editoral?

And you vote for the Man's platform .... not the parties....

Like republican's always vote or run with a strick 'party' platform..... maybe the neocons do..... but some isn't all.

yes an article is usually news based on fact an editorial is an opinion.

In this particular opinion the author decides to bring up the Republican "machine" with out any quotes. I didn't even ask for sources just a quote of what he's talking about because I havn't heard it.

To say this guy got "swiftboated" is is reaching.

Manedew · « **Reply #32 on:** August 03, 2005, 07:39:08 PM »

by useing that term you agree to it's definition I presume?

Just business as usual for republican's .... hardly needs a qoute, if you understand what 'swiftboating' means.

Lets have some quotes from your side?

This whole thread was started by an opinion. I didn't see the case proved that he ran a bait and switch campagin.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #33 on:** August 03, 2005, 08:06:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Manedew
by useing that term you agree to it's definition I presume?

Just business as usual for republican's .... hardly needs a qoute, if you understand what 'swiftboating' means.

Lets have some quotes from your side?

This whole thread was started by an opinion. I didn't see the case proved that he ran a bait and switch campagin.

eactly let's have some quotes from my side. I want to know what Rush and the Republican machine said about this guy to smear his military record thus "swiftboating" him. This guy could have been the greatest Marine in history and have excelent potential in politics but when he aligns himself with the liberal party he is going to lose simply because liberals do not have an agenda other than beating the republicans. I say all this based on the responses from the democrats about his loss saying this was a test about beating Bush. Wake up liberals its not ABB.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #34 on:** August 03, 2005, 08:18:50 PM »

Mane whats with you and this communist dreams website?

JBA · « **Reply #35 on:** August 03, 2005, 10:12:07 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by myelo
Are you counting Ronald Reagan, who was a Democrat before he switched?

Ran as And elected As a REPUBLICAN.
Case closed, next

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #36 on:** August 03, 2005, 10:15:53 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JBA
Ran as And elected As a REPUBLICAN.
Case closed, next

You gotta cut the Dems some slack, all they have these days is "close."

JBA · « **Reply #37 on:** August 03, 2005, 10:18:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Manedew
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0803-24.htm

...Calling the president the greatest threat to the safety and security of Americans....

Way to go marine: that would be “Commander and chief” threat to you.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #38 on:** August 03, 2005, 10:20:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JBA
...Calling the president the greatest threat to the safety and security of Americans....

Way to go marine: that would be “Commander and chief” threat to you.

that's actually a chargable offense because of the fact he's an officer. I knew of several zeros that went down during the whole clinton thing because they badmouthed him in editorials.

lazs2 · « **Reply #39 on:** August 04, 2005, 08:55:25 AM »

myelo... I was a democrat 35 years ago.. the democrats were a different party 35 years ago than they are today. They didn't want to be anyones mommy and they weren't so overtly socialist... we all thought LBJ was a rogue democrat then we relalized... the socialists and women had taken over the party.. It has just gotten worse.

but... lots of democrats wake up and become republicans... how many republicans become democrats?

charon.. It is good that he is a gun guy with pro U.S. constitution leanings... I would vote for him as a last resort... say if the only other candidates were democrats... but.. I don't trust him... he would still vote like a democrat and that is all that matters... he would line up with ted kennedy and finestein and all the other socialist freaks when push came to shove.

All politicians are gutless... they vote like sheep in lockstep with what will do their career in their party the most good.. that is why you have to allways choose a republican over a democrat.

you have to look at the leaders of each party and see what it is that they want...or ,,ore accurately... who they owe or who owns them and just figure that all the others in the party are just minions.

lazs

Edbert1 · « **Reply #40 on:** August 04, 2005, 09:17:33 AM »

Both candidates for Texas Governor are rehabilitated Democrats running as republicans. See, until recently, and for 100+ years, no Republican could be elected to statewide office, had something to do with Abraham Lincoln being one I'm pretty sure.

Nowadays, it is just the opposite, if you are a Democrat you cannot win a statewide election, so they all register and run as Republicans. Of course once in orrifice (the taxpayer's to be specific) they spend like TPT that just won the lottery.