Author Topic: UGLY early war bombers (Read 717 times)

Mr No Name · « **on:** March 05, 2006, 02:19:10 AM »

B-10, B-18 and B-23

Rino · « **Reply #1 on:** March 05, 2006, 10:49:19 AM »

We'd need subs for the B-18 and 23...B-10 was out of service well
before 1941.

Krusty · « **Reply #2 on:** March 05, 2006, 12:14:58 PM »

How about early bombers that... oh.. say... actually helped the war?

RTR · « **Reply #3 on:** March 05, 2006, 12:31:13 PM »

Bring the HE111, Halifax, Wellington and Betty to AH.

RTR

sullie363 · « **Reply #4 on:** March 05, 2006, 04:15:50 PM »

Or the B25, the most produced bomber of the war.

Whisky58 · « **Reply #5 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:26:46 PM »

B25 was a beaut - for ugly, try Armstrong Whitworth Whitley, Vickers Wellesley and Bristol Bombay, all of which were in active service for the RAF in WW2.

Regards

viper215 · « **Reply #6 on:** March 05, 2006, 06:27:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Krusty
How about early bombers that... oh.. say... actually helped the war?

Rino · « **Reply #7 on:** March 05, 2006, 07:56:23 PM »

Baltimore, Hampden, Stirling...any French bird

Mr No Name · « **Reply #8 on:** March 05, 2006, 08:36:50 PM »

didnt mean to imply there arent other far more common bombers missing fellas... just thought i'd throw in good planeset fillers in there that arent normally requested.