Author Topic: Oh I like the JU-88  (Read 1407 times)

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Oh I like the JU-88
« Reply #15 on: August 08, 2007, 09:52:09 PM »
this is why we need the Heinkel. to be partners with the junkers and HO any fighter with it's 20mm :D

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Oh I like the JU-88
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2007, 06:48:08 AM »
I'd like Ju88 even more if it had all the gun options it operationally had...pretty much like the B25 will have...

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline balance1

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 254
Oh I like the JU-88
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2007, 12:28:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rich46yo
and I was able to easily keep him in my rear until I "patienced him out".
 
slowly removes hands from keyboard and resists the urge to edit

You know your a dweeb when you love flight sims so much, you believe you can do it better and go start your own flight sim company.

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Oh I like the JU-88
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2007, 04:25:02 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
You know it has 500kg options as well? Screw the 250kg for 1 hangar @ salvo 3, take the 500kgs and salvo 1 for 4 hangars! (500kg =~1000lbs)

Then if you get a "near miss" and the hangar is soft, salvo off 5-10 of the 50kg bombs to finish it :D


CC Krusty, I have thaken the 4 x 500Kgs before but I do not like the additionl weight.  Every ounce of speed I can get is a good thing.

Offline stealer

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Oh I like the JU-88
« Reply #19 on: August 15, 2007, 02:05:07 PM »
I like the JU-88 because of its torpedo payload, unfortanetly, it's hard to get close to the fleet when flying low while being pummelled by the fleets guns.

Offline Yarbles

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6124
Oh I like the JU-88
« Reply #20 on: August 19, 2007, 06:01:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by balance1
slowly removes hands from keyboard and resists the urge to edit



:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

Now that is funny, but all that stuff about I havent flown it yet :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Anyway Rich 46:aok
DFC/GFC/OAP



"Don't get into arguments with idiots, they drag you down to their level and then win from experience"
"He who can laugh at himself has mastered himself"

Offline Relorian

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 90
      • http://www.wtf.com
Oh I like the JU-88
« Reply #21 on: August 20, 2007, 01:02:09 AM »
I love flying the JU-88.
With that said, it leaves a lot to be desired in defensive fire but this can be compensated for by knowing the arcs well and flying in a way to maximize the defensive potential.  

Also flying in groups gives better protection if those flying with you know how to fly in a decent, non gaping hole wide formation. It was the mainstay of bomber protection in the war because it works well. More guns firing at a target increases the odds it will go down before doing serious harm. (yes i know its a no duh type response, but you'd be amazed how many people think they can solo bomber something with out support and complain because they get shot down.)

If you find your not nailing the targets as well as you'd like, also consider that the JU-88 can double as a dive bomber and does have dive flaps to help in this role. Yes it means more risk and may lead to you getting shot down trying to DB with it, but it can also lend itself to playing a GV support role.

The only bomber I fly more than the 88 is the B-17 but thats for long distance bomb raids.