laz
I respect that you do want to be able to fight against ALL planes from ww2 in which ever plane you choose to fly in. It answers the original question and intent of this thread.
If that is more important to you then having non hoard fights that arnt disrupted by landgrabing then the AvA isnt your cup of coffee. No big deal really.
Personally for me when I wanan just fight in a fighter the AvA setting is actually more fun because the fights there arnt hoard type. I really hate the hoard.
What I would be very causious about though is calling the fights which come from the AvA planeset narrow and predictable. In some cases they are if its forexample 190A5s vs SpitVs. Then definatly yes you are right.
But if you take a look at the current planeset in the AvA
Axis
109E4, F4, G2, G6, G14, K4
190A5, 190D9
110C4-b, 110G-2
FM2
Hurri1
Allies
HurriI2c
SpitV
P40E
Il2
La5, La7
Yak9T, Yak9U
There are so many type of fights that can spur from this that its just as varied as the MA. In the MA your enemy will either be in a plane similar to yours, in a faster plane or in a more agile plane. The enemy force will have a combination of similar, faster and more agile plane then yours. Your force will have the same combination.
With this planeset its the EXACT same thing.
With other planesets what your saying is valid, its narrower. But with this that argument aint valid.
But still all I wanted to know is why the AvA isnt a better furballing place then the MA since the AvA doesnt have any of the issues that the furballers are complaining about with the MA.
Tex