Author Topic: Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!  (Read 424 times)

Offline sparow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
      • http://249sqn.wordpress.com/
Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!
« on: August 20, 2007, 12:59:47 PM »
Hi all,

Now, seriously, would any port be taken by a JABO and a guy in an M3 driving ten drunks home?

Ports are important targets, should be defended as such!

More ack, harder to bomb, more troops to capture...

Harder to get, in 3 words.

Cheers,
Sparow
249 Sqn RAF "Gold Coast"
Consistently beeing shot down since Tour 33 (MA) and Tour 8  (CT/AvA)

Visit us at http://249sqn.wordpress.com/

Offline Tiger

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 766
Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2007, 01:14:31 PM »
I feel there should be additional AAA at the ports.

As far as more troops...  I think it should be raised to 20 or 30 across the board for Port, Air Fields, and Vehicle Bases.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2007, 01:17:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by sparow
Hi all,

Now, seriously, would any port be taken by a JABO and a guy in an M3 driving ten drunks home?

Ports are important targets, should be defended as such!

More ack, harder to bomb, more troops to capture...

Harder to get, in 3 words.

Cheers,


How about this real novel idea and up some fighters to defend it?  Oh wait, that would entail you actually trying to fight someone.  My mistake, carry on.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline dedalos

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8052
Re: Re: Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2007, 01:51:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
How about this real novel idea and up some fighters to defend it?  Oh wait, that would entail you actually trying to fight someone.  My mistake, carry on.


ack-ack


I have come in NOE into a VH.  1 262 for deacking and 1 goon from the other side.  262 deacks and then dies trying to kill the flaks that came out to defend.  Goon turns off engines and glides in.  Troops out and the base is gone with everyone wondering what happened.

You cant always deffend on time.  You cant always just keep looking at the map to see whats flashing.  Sometimes you are in a plane fighting you know?  

Maybe attach a town to them.  Killing a few guns is not worth a base, IMO
Quote from: 2bighorn on December 15, 2010 at 03:46:18 PM
Dedalos pretty much ruined DA.

Offline sparow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
      • http://249sqn.wordpress.com/
Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2007, 01:56:40 PM »
Hi chaps,

Thank you for your replies. I've been in many desperate port defenses. Usually airborne, sometimes in ack, sometimes in GV's...

Still think they are pretty undefended, especially in automatic mode.

Experts take a Port in 2 minutes. It takes 2, usually, although I took one by myself once.

More troops for capture, over the board, would be nice, yes.

Cheers,
Sparow
249 Sqn RAF "Gold Coast"
Consistently beeing shot down since Tour 33 (MA) and Tour 8  (CT/AvA)

Visit us at http://249sqn.wordpress.com/

Offline Tiger

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 766
Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2007, 02:54:29 PM »
I have taken ports and V-bases solo before.
Fly 110 in, kill the ack.  I even took the time to fly back and land then reupped a Goon w/ troops.

That's the only reason I say it should take 20-30 troops.  Keeps you from being able to solo capture.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!
« Reply #6 on: August 20, 2007, 02:56:37 PM »
Ports should have their own runways so they don't to rely on the CV for airborne support (especially under circumstances where the guys defending don' HAVE the CV, because the other country has hid it somewhere off the map). Maybe with Blue Planes only?
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!
« Reply #7 on: August 20, 2007, 02:59:22 PM »
About the only change needed IMO is adding 1-2 more vehicle hangers.  Once that 1 is gone there is no more defense.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline sparow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
      • http://249sqn.wordpress.com/
Pearl Harbour taken by 2 IJN players!!!
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2007, 05:48:57 PM »
Hi chaps!

I'm with BaldEagl here: 2 more VHs but I would add 10 extra ack positions, 2 mannable, 8 fully auto and would up the # of troops to 30.

Think that it would do or, at least, it would take 4 guys to take it...

Cheers,
Sparow
249 Sqn RAF "Gold Coast"
Consistently beeing shot down since Tour 33 (MA) and Tour 8  (CT/AvA)

Visit us at http://249sqn.wordpress.com/