Author Topic: The Superfortress  (Read 3040 times)

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
The Superfortress
« Reply #75 on: September 08, 2007, 10:35:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Snubby
I know if I had to drop 200+ points on one I would fly it like its made of glass..

and damn sure wouldent be seen below 15k without escorts.


                       Yeah, the pucker factor was bad enough tonight when I was at 2,000' on final, at 200 mph, in 3 AR-234s when a bogey popped up on radar in my way.:O Whomever it was didnt know a smorgasboard of perks was being hand delivered on a silver platter had he only stayed put.

                     Imagine the clenched rear ends with flaps down, in 200 point B-29s, running into a gaggle of murderous 14yo's enroute to the latest furball?:huh
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
The Superfortress
« Reply #76 on: September 09, 2007, 04:38:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Jebus
I usually try and count how many responses on these post before this shows up

:aok


Tell me about it.  I wish i never made it.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline PhatHat

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21
The Superfortress
« Reply #77 on: September 17, 2007, 11:53:08 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Latrobe
We would have a plane that could carry a nuke but we wont HAVE the nuke. B-29 didn't just have the Atomic bomb as payload, it did strategic bombing with regular dumb bombs, and incindiary bombs over Japan. If we add the B-29 to AH it WON'T have the nuke but dumb bombs, and HT could tweak the payload so we can't carry 40 1,000lb bombs with us. The B-29 would also be greatly perked (I hope) so we have something else other than the 234 to use our bomber perks on. If you don't like big payload bombers don't fly them, but the rest of us may want it.


Right, but five minutes before the map reset we could nuke each other. Come on you know it's fun to glow in the dark.

Offline 5PointOh

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
The Superfortress
« Reply #78 on: September 17, 2007, 10:13:11 PM »
:noid No Nuclear warfare needed.
Coprhead
Wings of Terror
Mossie Student Driver

Offline Tiger

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 766
The Superfortress
« Reply #79 on: September 27, 2007, 01:21:31 PM »
Man how fun would it be to load the B-29 up with 200 x 100lb bombs ?!?!?  Full salvo, delay .05 and let them drop the length of the runway from about 30k alt.  That's what you call vluchin baby.

Offline hunter128

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 285
The Superfortress
« Reply #80 on: September 27, 2007, 05:18:02 PM »
Quote
it has teh strenght of over 20,000lbs. of tnt


IT'S A TRAP!!!

we cant withstand firepower of that magnitude!
Darth2
71 'Eagle' Squadron RAF
"I strive for better flying....when I'm not flying into the ground"
"By the way, this entire thread is dumber than a sack of dead cats....." - Widewing

Offline SuperDud

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4587
The Superfortress
« Reply #81 on: September 27, 2007, 07:30:20 PM »
There was something I use to do at this point...
SuperDud
++Blue Knights++

Offline 7years

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
The Superfortress
« Reply #82 on: September 28, 2007, 12:17:50 AM »
Enola Gay Superfortress put the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima August 6 1945, nicknamed "little boy"

Offline mentalguy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 667
The Superfortress
« Reply #83 on: September 28, 2007, 08:50:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 7years
Enola Gay Superfortress put the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima August 6 1945, nicknamed "little boy"


So?
PFC. Corey "Mentalguy" Gibson
USMC

Offline Neubob

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2446
      • My Movie Clip Website
The Superfortress
« Reply #84 on: September 28, 2007, 09:42:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 7years
Enola Gay Superfortress put the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima August 6 1945, nicknamed "little boy"


I don't think it's good policy to name yourself after your age.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
The Superfortress
« Reply #85 on: September 28, 2007, 03:26:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Neubob
I don't think it's good policy to name yourself after your age.

He didn't, named for his mental development.

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
The Superfortress
« Reply #86 on: September 28, 2007, 03:31:26 PM »
Quote
He didn't, named for his mental development.


 ... and for some reason, I thought it meant the number of years it would take for him to figure out how to change a lightbulb.