Author Topic: Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step  (Read 12853 times)

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #360 on: February 15, 2006, 08:53:41 AM »
So it was built with both engines and both are correct.  Moving on.

So we can eliminate the engine as a source of possible additional drag in the majority of P51B/C/D series.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2006, 08:57:40 AM by Crumpp »

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #361 on: February 15, 2006, 09:32:35 AM »
I was, too, under the impression that the bubble canopy was not  necessarily a drag reducing factor. The movement of air became more turbulent behind the canopy so that a fillet had to be added in front of vertical stabilizer to make it more stable.

So I just made a assumption that the better rear view was well worth the increase in drag.  Maybe it didn't affect the drag at all but only the stability?

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #362 on: February 15, 2006, 09:39:30 AM »
The P51B/C's had the same stability issues and it was caused by the propeller.  The correction was the dorsal fin extension.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #363 on: February 15, 2006, 10:49:27 AM »
I've lost you Crumpp:
"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A reduction like that in parasite drag is stunning.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



It's an increase not a reduction. Look at the FW-190 weapon installation. Blisters, wing covers, barrels, and all the changes to the motor compartment.

Have you even seen the FW-190V5 series? They were new type prototypes without weapons and the very first installation of the BMW801 series. The earlier prototypes had the BMW139."

Thought you were talking about the drag on those two. That would roughly mean clean vs dirty. Never mentioned any finish.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #364 on: February 15, 2006, 01:59:27 PM »
Quote
I've lost you Crumpp:


You have not lost me a bit.  I do think your starting to see the holes in the:

Quote
Can we say somthing dosn't pass a smell test?


Argument.  


I am sure it does smell rotten when you do not know the details of the design changes and assume you know more than the actual engineers.

All the best,

Crumpp

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #365 on: February 15, 2006, 04:55:44 PM »
So, please explain the types being tested and their differences A & B. Or is it buried somewhere earlier in the thread? Still looks like a big number to me but if it's "clean" vs "dirty" it should be ok...I think.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #366 on: August 18, 2009, 03:01:41 PM »
See Rule #10
« Last Edit: August 19, 2009, 03:01:17 PM by Skuzzy »
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #367 on: August 18, 2009, 05:01:34 PM »
First, I can no longer pull the graph. My firewall's screening its site.

It's probably not hosted anymore, being 3 years old

wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17921
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #368 on: August 18, 2009, 06:34:24 PM »
It only took him 3 years to do the math   :D

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #369 on: August 18, 2009, 08:21:14 PM »
PJ_Godzilla = Crumpp?
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #370 on: August 19, 2009, 05:42:30 AM »
PJ_Godzilla = Crumpp?

Nah. "Or did I get this all wrong?" is not something Crumpp asks.

He has charts, you know.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #371 on: August 19, 2009, 08:09:17 AM »
PJ_Godzilla = Crumpp?

The Rubber Lizard doesn't lurk behind other aliases. The Rubber Lizard wades through buildings toward the center of town.

Sorry about the belated response. The thread predates me and I'm almost exclusively an LW flyer so I'm always thinking about how to wring performance out of the 190s. I find the 109s to be much easier, honestly, and have taken a real shine to the G-14 lately. Of course, the K-4 is more capable in all but the flat turn but the G-14 is a sweet balance - as is the F-4. Too bad about the crappy dive performance. If it had that, it'd be perfect.

Anyway, I'm sure I went through all this in Aircraft Performance - I actually took that class from N.X. Vinh, former commander of the RVN Air Force, UM Prof after that.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
Re: Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #372 on: August 19, 2009, 01:25:13 PM »
Anyway, I'm sure I went through all this in Aircraft Performance - I actually took that class from N.X. Vinh, former commander of the RVN Air Force, UM Prof after that.

You are a lucky guy, Nguyen X. Vinh was not only a pilot and aerospace engineer but also an outstanding mathematician. I've read some of his work, and own one of his books, but never met or communicated with him.

Badboy
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Maybe the 190s arent wrong....or how to be really unpopular in 1 step
« Reply #373 on: August 19, 2009, 01:39:58 PM »
You are a lucky guy, Nguyen X. Vinh was not only a pilot and aerospace engineer but also an outstanding mathematician. I've read some of his work, and own one of his books, but never met or communicated with him.

Badboy

Indeed... he wrote me a letter of recommendation for my grad school trip out to Palo Alto. Not only was N.X. Vinh what you say, he was also a chain-smoking gambler who would never spend more than rock-bottom on a new car. I recall his new Escort wagon in 1985 - I didn't know you could delete the trim rings for credit.

Anyway, he was a fun-loving guy - from what I new of him. I always thought of him as a cross between a typical fighter pilot and a stereotypical Vietnamese: think of Maverick meets the VC Russian roulette player in the Deerhunter Tiger Cage.

He complained a bit about the Spitfire, btw. He said their turn rate was such that he was never sure on which side of the obstacle he needed to be. He depicted this, to a lot of laughter, in his heavy Vietnamese accent on the board via crude cartoons one day - jumping a stick figure from one side of a wall to another.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.