Author Topic: this would be a nice plane to have  (Read 1022 times)

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: this would be a nice plane to have
« Reply #15 on: August 06, 2008, 08:26:00 PM »
This fits the bill for three purposes:

One: Another Jap plane.

Two: A float plane/flying boat.  It is a gap that will eventually need to be filled and this may be a better choise for the AH2 sim/game than the US PBY.

Three: Multi-pupose. I say allow it to actually be a multi-purpose plane and have it carry ord, or veh supps, or field supps (but not paras), AND have a tank gun like zoom for long range recon.  No CV group would be safe!   :)

Good pick, Valdal.     
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: this would be a nice plane to have
« Reply #16 on: August 06, 2008, 09:49:53 PM »
Sadly, where the H8K2 "Emily" fails critically is in the artwork department.  Not that the data isn't available, it is (there is still an Emily in existence), but in the amount of work required.  The Emily is so big and has so many compartments with gunners in them that the art work for the Emily would be something like doing the B-17, B-24 and Lancaster combined.

Ok, maybe just the B-17 and Lancaster.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SectorNine50

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1331
Re: this would be a nice plane to have
« Reply #17 on: August 06, 2008, 11:48:50 PM »
29 or 64 passengers?  Jeeze... Imagine those falling over a base! :-P
I'm Sector95 in-game! :-D