Give us this in the MAs

[Twizzty]

What I meant was strats having to be knocked down to a certain % along with capturing 40% of the other two countries bases to win.

  Absolutely, great idea.

[opposum]

OMG I would die and go to heaven if they put this in the game,

have little streams, bridges, rail ways, trains, trucks, and everything in it and I would be content


  ^{googleth powergoogleth powergoogleth power}




opposum

[1pLUs44]

+1, and it would be harder to get #1 in bombing.

[Bronk]

To all the people who complain about lag, Take the C64 you are playing on and throw it out your window.

Really fire up karelia <sp> map watch as your frames drop.  Now add ac..gv..fire...smoke... tracers.

 

[all5x]

  Add an Ack tower in the center of the city, and any surrounding bridges that access the city could be bombed with a sufficient amount of ords until they spawn back up or are accelerated thru repair via re-supply. Just think as a last resort to defend your town from the hordes of enemy armor, you must blow your own bridges to slow capture.." Oh great gods of ones and zeros (Hi-tech)”…!! Please grant our wishes for a massive town of perpetual game play ......
ALL5X

[kilz]

i can see the darbar from all the milkrunners

[opposum]

whew, 5 pages of solid agreement to back this wish, I think it needs to be implamented 






opposum

[BaldEagl]

The more I think about this the less I like it.

I do like the idea of it graphically but the downside is that no one would have to learn to calibrate for a bomb drop in a buff anymore.  Any dweeb could carpet bomb this city without bothering to learn to calibrate.

To offset that there should be targets of "importance" throughout the city which would need to be hit for scoring purposes, with the "standard" town buildings giving no score.  This would still allow for potential GV battles throughout the city, would still allow for the graphic eye candy but would also not dilute the bombing "skill" required in the game.  It would be more akin to hitting strategic targets within a large city as was the case IRL.

[whiteman]

with the amount of lan-stukas, dive bombing B-17's and NOE B-24's is it really going to be different. I think it may at least get these guys to fly at altitude because of the greater chance of hitting something. add a small amount of wind to make it a bit more challenging.

[Krusty]

Also, if there ARE a lotta folks attacking, you DO have to aim, or you plunk your bombs down square on the patch of buildings that's already been bombed out before you got there

[Denholm]

Too bad the dead buildings look the same as the live buildings from 30,000.

[Krusty]

If you've ever bombed strats, you'd know you can tell the difference through the bomb sight.

[Treize69]

Too bad the dead buildings look the same as the live buildings from 30,000.

I never have that problem. Usually the lack of roof is a dead giveaway...

[FYB]

I never have that problem. Usually the lack of roof is a dead giveaway...

I wonder... 

-FYB