Author Topic: what´s the difference between a 152 H0 and H1? (Read 691 times)

niklas · « **on:** February 20, 2001, 04:23:00 PM »

ok the H1 is heavier maybe. But else?
Different engine maybe?

niklas

RAM · « **Reply #1 on:** February 20, 2001, 04:24:00 PM »

Vermillion · « **Reply #2 on:** February 20, 2001, 04:25:00 PM »

In short, due to production difficulties, the H0 did not have high pressure MW50 or GM1.

I think maybe a few of the H0s may have had low pressure MW50, but I would have to check to be sure.

------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #3 on:** February 20, 2001, 06:26:00 PM »

Interestingly enough nearly all the weight difference between H-0 and H-1 was due to the H-1s greater fuel storage in wing tanks, empty weight is within 100-200lbs for both. this should be one hell of a high alt turner and climber, as the H-0 models were vs P51s and 47s up high. Too bad buff guns are still garbage when attacking the 30k b17 dweebs.

niklas · « **Reply #4 on:** February 21, 2001, 01:26:00 AM »

Was the name of the 152 H0 engine jumo213E0 then, and for the H1 213E1?

Or did both 152 have the E1 engine?

niklas

juzz · « **Reply #5 on:** February 21, 2001, 03:07:00 AM »

AFAIK, the only appreciable difference is in fuel tanks.
Ta 152H-0
Fuselage: 594l main + 115l rear.
Wings: none.
Ta 152H-1
Fuselage: 594l main + 85l GM-1.
Wings: 400l(5 tanks) + 70l MW 50.

RAM · « **Reply #6 on:** February 21, 2001, 03:41:00 AM »

woopla thats almost 40% more in H1. Good, because with the fuel modifier I had my doubhts that it would be able to climb to the optimal altitude.

the H1 definitely will have enough