« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Me-109 vs. Bf-109  (Read 1204 times)

Offline 2bighorn

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2829
Re: Me-109 vs. Bf-109
« Reply #15 on: July 18, 2011, 12:21:52 PM »
Quote from: Krusty on July 18, 2011, 12:09:31 PM
No, from somebody that doesn't bother to read links or to read posts, and just wants to insult.

So, you added copyright infringement to your resume?

Here, refresher:
Official type identifier for 109 and 110 was Bf. Just because, on occasion and in error, Me was/is used, it does not make it right.



Logged

Offline Zeagle

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 670
Re: Me-109 vs. Bf-109
« Reply #16 on: July 22, 2011, 01:46:01 PM »
HT could I get one of those new Krusty meters?  I don't think mine goes high enough...:devil
Logged
-Zeagle-
"Black 1"

FW-ISS Bremen

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Me-109 vs. Bf-109
« Reply #17 on: July 22, 2011, 02:02:27 PM »
That is a term used by the Allies.  With that being said, what Krusty posted is completely accurate.  We may never have been trivial with our nomenclature, but the German's were. 

Quote from: 2bighorn on July 18, 2011, 12:21:52 PM
So, you added copyright infringement to your resume?

Here, refresher:
Official type identifier for 109 and 110 was Bf. Just because, on occasion and in error, Me was/is used, it does not make it right.




Logged
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »