Author Topic: F-4 Rear Canopy  (Read 4825 times)

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8998
Re: F-4 Rear Canopy
« Reply #45 on: April 29, 2014, 11:44:30 AM »
What exactly was the purpose for the water injection? Was it also used on the F-106?
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Puma44

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6762
Re: F-4 Rear Canopy
« Reply #46 on: April 29, 2014, 02:50:48 PM »
What exactly was the purpose for the water injection? Was it also used on the F-106?
Water injection provided more thrust.  The "Six" didn't have water injection.  It did have a hard burner light off.  There was no doubt that a 106 was taking off when the burner lit.  It was a very robust explosive sound that rattled windows all over base.





All gave some, Some gave all

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9423
Re: F-4 Rear Canopy
« Reply #47 on: April 29, 2014, 08:00:45 PM »
It did have a hard burner light off. 


Other than some sort of preverted party idea....WTF is a hard burner light off?

- oldman

Offline Puma44

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6762
Re: F-4 Rear Canopy
« Reply #48 on: April 29, 2014, 08:22:06 PM »

Other than some sort of preverted party idea....WTF is a hard burner light off?

- oldman

The six AB lit off all at once kinda like tossing a bucket of gas on your campfire.....WHOOSHBANG all at once vs most other AB equiped jets that lit off in a graduated manner.  Still very noisy when lit off, just not the intial BANG.  Otherwise know as a soft lite vs a hard lite. Note the burner shrouds on this F-4.  In MIL power they would be closed down making the exhaust opening smaller in diameter.  With the burner lit, the shrouds would modulate as the pilot selected a range of power between MIN and MAX AB.




All gave some, Some gave all