Your rig

[38ruk]

Here is the 980ti

[Chalenge]

That's more in keeping with what I had as a result. I would really like to see how the 1080s bench by comparison.

BTW, I think the low frames may be because of a slower HDD, and I notice this Heaven benchmark does not seem to respond well to SLI.

[Pudgie]

Hmmm pudgie , surprised my 390 scored a little better than yours cause it shouldn't. Mine came in a bit over 3800, wonder why.  My 980ti just came so i figured id run the 390 threw with the settings above just to compare . Your Min FPS seems a bit low , im thinking you must be running a higher setting somewhere that we aren't .

Hi 38ruk,

The 1st benchmark is from using the latest Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0 which is far more GPU intensive than Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0.

Here is my Fury x under the Valley Benchmark 1.0 using the same settings as in the Heaven Benchmark 4.0:

Note the difference.

Also note that the Fury X actually ran faster avg FPS under the Heaven Benchmark 4.0 than Valley Benchmark 1.0 but scored higher under Valley Benchmark 1.0 than Heaven Benchmark 4.0.

This tells me that these benchmarks score more towards the GPU's ability to actually render quality graphics frames, especially concerning the polygon counts, fill rates, etc within them, and less on how fast they do it.

 

[Gman]

Just got a couple of the new Titans, and moved out a couple 1080s in SLI for them.  I don't have plans to run them SLI long term, just to do some fooling around and some tests, and then run them as single cards for our PCs we're using for the Rift and Vive, as VR is pretty much a single GPU deal still right now. 

[38ruk]

Hi 38ruk,

The 1st benchmark is from using the latest Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0 which is far more GPU intensive than Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0.

Here is my Fury x under the Valley Benchmark 1.0 using the same settings as in the Heaven Benchmark 4.0:

Note the difference.

Also note that the Fury X actually ran faster avg FPS under the Heaven Benchmark 4.0 than Valley Benchmark 1.0 but scored higher under Valley Benchmark 1.0 than Heaven Benchmark 4.0.

This tells me that these benchmarks score more towards the GPU's ability to actually render quality graphics frames, especially concerning the polygon counts, fill rates, etc within them, and less on how fast they do it.

 

Drrrr... im an idiot haha .... didnt even notice the 1.0 VS 4.0 difference . No wonder ive been looking at scores and wondering whats going on lol.  Thanks for the info ! <S>