Author Topic: Name This...(252)  (Read 266 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(252)
« on: April 12, 2002, 04:40:38 PM »
???

Offline Dr Zhivago

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
Name This...(252)
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2002, 05:02:46 PM »
Djakonov rifle grenade...:p :confused: :p

Offline Dr Zhivago

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
Name This...(252)
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2002, 05:08:44 PM »
Or is it M9/M9A1 HEAT anti-tank grenade...  ;)

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
Name This...(252)
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2002, 05:34:34 PM »
a garand with a morter

Offline superpug1

  • Probation
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 929
Name This...(252)
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2002, 10:07:06 PM »
anti tank:( against a panzer it would be like spitting at it.:eek: :mad:

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Name This...(252)
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2002, 01:31:15 AM »
It has a "shaped charge" it burns it's way through armor, two models, M28= will penatrate 8 inches of armor. M31= 10 inches armor, 20 inches concrete , range 350 yrds,

Never saw one launched like that , we had a tall clipon rear sight cause it's a high angle weapon and it was launched with a M3 crimped round (special blank)

Also comes in smoke and illumination types


*note: this info is from 1962, but he's using a M-1 garand so i may be right.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2002, 01:42:41 AM by john9001 »

Offline fdiron

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 697
Name This...(252)
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2002, 02:53:59 AM »
So theoretically this anti-tank granade could destroy a Tiger II tank?

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Name This...(252)
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2002, 04:46:28 AM »
Interesting weapon.. though, I don't belive they were that capable in WWII, or there wouldn't been german tanks anymore....

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Name This...(252)
« Reply #8 on: April 13, 2002, 06:23:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
It has a "shaped charge" it burns it's way through armor, two models, M28= will penatrate 8 inches of armor. M31= 10 inches armor, 20 inches concrete , range 350 yrds,

Never saw one launched like that , we had a tall clipon rear sight cause it's a high angle weapon and it was launched with a M3 crimped round (special blank)

Also comes in smoke and illumination types


*note: this info is from 1962, but he's using a M-1 garand so i may be right.


That is not an M1 Garrand. It's an M1903A3.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Tracer-15

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 248
      • http://www.geocities.com/drenched15/mypage.html
Name This...(252)
« Reply #9 on: April 13, 2002, 08:49:24 AM »
you got the AT-bomb right but they CAN be launched from M1's....if you ever watch the movie Battle of The Bulge when the panzers first attack they use these bombs fired from M1's....

Offline lord dolf vader

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1528
Name This...(252)
« Reply #10 on: April 13, 2002, 09:47:36 AM »
being nit picky but its a 1903 but not a a3 the stock comes further back twards the reciever on the (1903) the a3 has the big square elevation sight also. :)

http://mwade.net/1903/cat/smof3019.jpg   = 1903

http://mwade.net/1903/cat/smof3005.jpg   = 1903 a3


i am honored to have this dicussion no offence intended

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(252)
« Reply #11 on: April 13, 2002, 03:11:02 PM »
Antitank Rifle Grenade M9A1, it is:)

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Name This...(252)
« Reply #12 on: April 13, 2002, 07:39:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lord dolf vader
being nit picky but its a 1903 but not a a3 the stock comes further back twards the reciever on the (1903) the a3 has the big square elevation sight also. :)

http://mwade.net/1903/cat/smof3019.jpg   = 1903

http://mwade.net/1903/cat/smof3005.jpg   = 1903 a3


i am honored to have this dicussion no offence intended


I own an 03A3. The rifle is an 03A3. Take a look at the distance between the trigger guard and the rear-most edge of the upper handguard. Then compare again. Note that the rifle (with grenade) has an aperture sight mounted at the rear of the receiver.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Name This...(252)
« Reply #13 on: April 13, 2002, 08:15:45 PM »
To me it looks like A3..

Offline lord dolf vader

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1528
Name This...(252)
« Reply #14 on: April 14, 2002, 05:16:23 AM »
oops got my designations wrong should have known better.