Author Topic: Worse than Watergate?  (Read 1948 times)

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #60 on: July 14, 2003, 01:35:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
the main reason given by benladen for 9-11 was the US troops in saudi arabia.(holy land)
the reason US troops were in saudi arabia was to protect the saudis from iraq.
::therefore:: remove the threat to the saudis and US troops can leave arabia.


My how supple you are.
when you bend over that far to come up with things like that can you taste your own colon?

The US invades Iraq to get out of Arabia! of course. Like they got out of Japan and Germany and cuba and South Korea and Panama and Vietnam..oh ya. they did leave Vietnam.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #61 on: July 14, 2003, 01:43:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
Any Arab nation with WMD is a potentially serious threat to me.

You Saddam Hussein supporters deserve whats coming.


Strange the nonsence you can babble on this board and not get banned for it. Your a disgrace to you handle.

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #62 on: July 14, 2003, 01:56:50 PM »
Actually Pongo, your personal attacks are more of a reason for banning that anything else said in this thread.  Just FYI.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #63 on: July 14, 2003, 02:28:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Skuzzy
Actually Pongo, your personal attacks are more of a reason for banning that anything else said in this thread.  Just FYI.


LOL....I love it when you mask subtly with a big mallet

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Re: Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #64 on: July 14, 2003, 02:55:43 PM »
I disagree that the Bush's desinformation about the yellowcake was a deceit similar to the Watergate.

 I would hardly call it a deceit at all because it required enourmous cooperation on the part of the persons supposedely being deceited.

 Like if Bush said "Hussein is collecting rubber bands, he may build a huge slingshot and hurl giant spitballs of destruction towards the american cities". It does not matter really if he was or was not buying rubber bands. A congressman who is willing to believe that rubber bands can be assembled into a trans-continental slingshot has no right to claim being deceited.

 Any half-educated person or anyone with an access to expert's opinion (physics college student for example) would easily learn that in order to enrich yellowcake into weapon-grade uranium Iraq would need a giant industrial facility on the scale of a small city that would be impossible to build and run undetectably even if they had the necessary components.

 miko

Offline Syzygyone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Re: Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #65 on: July 14, 2003, 02:57:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by miko2d
I disagree that the Bush's desinformation about the yellowcake was a deceit similar to the Watergate.

 Any half-educated person or anyone with an access to expert's opinion (physics college student for example) would easily learn that in order to enrich yellowcake into weapon-grade uranium Iraq would need a giant industrial facility on the scale of a small city that would be impossible to build and run undetectably even if they had the necessary components.

 miko


Miko:

Haven't you heard of the Bat Cave?
Sheesh!  Get a clue young man!:rolleyes:

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #66 on: July 14, 2003, 03:15:20 PM »
Your a disgrace to you handle.
====
Dont know much about the General do you........  Lets just say that he and I share a similar common sense and wisdom about the world which you apparently lack.  Stick with it though, wisdom isnt something your born with.  It takes time -and like a good wine, just gets better with age :)
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Rude

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4609
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #67 on: July 14, 2003, 05:04:32 PM »
Quote
Any half-educated person or anyone with an access to expert's opinion (physics college student for example) would easily learn that in order to enrich yellowcake into weapon-grade uranium Iraq would need a giant industrial facility on the scale of a small city that would be impossible to build and run undetectably even if they had the necessary components.


Like a small city? What a load of misinformation....you really expect anyone to buy that?

The enrichment of uranium can be accomplished in a building as small as 1m sq. ft.

Do your homework next time before sellin us the biz wally.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2003, 05:10:41 PM by Rude »

Offline Syzygyone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #68 on: July 14, 2003, 05:06:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rude
The enrichment of uranium can be accomplished in a building as small as 20k sq. ft.



And the Bat Cave was easliy 30,000 sq feet.  See!

Offline Rude

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4609
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #69 on: July 14, 2003, 05:12:04 PM »
Actually, the entire process from cleaning thru refinement would require a 1m sq. ft. facility...kinda like a great big batcave:)

Offline GrimCO

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 721
      • http://www.GrimsReapers.com
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #70 on: July 15, 2003, 09:12:38 AM »
Oh yeah??????

I eat enriched wheat bread, and the bakery that makes it is 50,000 square feet.

So there.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Worse than Watergate?
« Reply #71 on: July 15, 2003, 09:16:31 AM »
I could enrich that uranium in 15k sq feet.










(this is a contest isn't it?)