Author Topic: Poor frame rates on workstation  (Read 1047 times)

Offline HavocTM

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
      • http://www.bops.us
Poor frame rates on workstation
« on: October 15, 2003, 05:25:11 PM »
Frame Rates 15-20 expected a little better on high end system

Dual Xeon 1.7G, 1GB RAM, FX5200 128MB

Machine name: HAVOC-XP
   Operating System: Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 1 (2600.xpsp2.030422-1633)
           Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard
       System Model: hp workstation
               BIOS: Ver 1.00PARTTBL
          Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 1700MHz (2 CPUs)
             Memory: 1022MB RAM
          Page File: 228MB used, 2233MB available
        Windows Dir: C:\WINDOWS
    DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0b (4.09.0000.0902)
DX Setup Parameters: Unknown Switch (6)
     DxDiag Version: 5.03.0001.0902 32bit Unicode

  Card name: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 (Omega KX 1.4523a)
     Manufacturer: NVIDIA (Omega KX 1.4523a)
        Chip type: GeForce FX 5200
         DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
       Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&SUBSYS_00000000&REV_A1
   Display Memory: 128.0 MB
     Current Mode: 1280 x 1024 (32 bit) (60Hz)
          Monitor: Plug and Play Monitor
  Monitor Max Res: 1600,1200
      Driver Name: nv4_disp.dll
   Driver Version: 6.14.0010.4523 (English)
      DDI Version: 9 (or higher)
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
 Driver Date/Size: 7/28/2003 15:19:00, 3902603 bytes
      WHQL Logo'd: Yes

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Poor frame rates on workstation
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2003, 05:37:02 PM »
Havoc, that 5200FX card is not much faster than a GF2 Ultra.  You are getting what I would expect from the Beta and that video card.  Remember, AH2 is more video card dependent than AH1 is.

Remember, it is a Beta.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline HavocTM

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
      • http://www.bops.us
Poor frame rates on workstation
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2003, 05:43:00 PM »
No prob!  I will try it on my home monster tonite... also have a Quadro in this machine so will try that.

Thanks Skuzzy!

Beer is on me tonite, you guys did good today.

Offline HavocTM

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
      • http://www.bops.us
Poor frame rates on workstation
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2003, 05:47:59 PM »
OK HA HA!

I tried same machine, switching to the Quadro 2 Pro GL card and fps dropped to 3 -5.

Guess I shouldn't be playing games at work!

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Poor frame rates on workstation
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2003, 08:45:54 PM »
I could have told you the Quatro cards were going to be really slow.  They are designed for OpenGL acceleration and not D3D.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline GrWolf

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
      • http://www.virtual100thbgh.com
Poor frame rates on workstation
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2003, 09:54:27 PM »
I'm getting approximately the same FRP's.  On average 12 to 14.

My system:
  CPU:  Intel 800 PIII
  Video:  Radeon 8500  128M
              Driver - 6.14.10.6387
  RAM: 512 MB
  Operating System: Windows XP
  DirectX: 9.0

The clouds were causing a small problem as they flickered in and out.  I turned off horizon and everything is looks great.