Author Topic: Why Iraq's Weapons don't matter, and the primary source materials to back it up  (Read 545 times)

Offline Gadfly

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1364
I realize that some of you will not read these links; your narrow minds are already filled to the brim with your own brand of political straw.  For the others that may have doubts, here is the basis and the facts on the current war on Iraq.  The first link is opinion, the rest are primary source data from the United Nations and the U.S. Government, with some major media links.

every state has "the right . . . to protect itself by preventing a condition of affairs in which it will be too late to protect itself."


Do you think that Saddam Hussein does or does not have the capability to use chemical or biological weapons against targets in the US?" an overwhelming 79% said that he does.

Statement by IAEA Director General Hans Blix on IAEA Inspections in Iraq to the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Inspections in Iraq

STATEMENT TO THE FIFTY-SECOND SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY

THE SECURITY COUNCIL, 27 JANUARY 2003:

As for other questions that have been raised regarding the war, for example the rumor that there are Americans held at Gitmo , and the fact that there are restrictions on our freedoms, I can only offer that we are in a War, a declared war, not of our choosing, and if you are queasy about some of the acts of our Government, I recommend you to the study of Jefferson, Lincoln and Roosevelt.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
sand

Offline Gadfly

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1364
Nope, Sandman, I am providing in all honesty the facts.  A troll would imply that I do not believe what I am posting, but I most certainly do.

(Cool graphic, may I steal it?)

Offline YUCCA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 985
I dont think you ask to steal something. lol

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Quote
Originally posted by Gadfly

(Cool graphic, may I steal it?)


Go ahead. I did.



Back on topic... I know where this is going... it is the beginning of yet another "WMD doesn't matter! Yes it does! No it doesn't! Yes it does!" thread.


I believe the WMD (or lack of) does matter. Before the invasion, Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rice and Powell all said that the WMD mattered. It is and will remain a key issue.
sand

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman_SBM
Back on topic... I know where this is going... it is the beginning of yet another "WMD doesn't matter! Yes it does! No it doesn't! Yes it does!" thread.


No it isn't.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
So what could we make of the above post?

Gadfly feels comfortable about his civil rights being stomped collectively since the 911 because they're at war .. now. And that somehow justifies it. Ok.

Gadfly agrees to the article which states pre-emptive strikers are an ok thing based on suspicion. With the same logic North Korea has every right to build nukes to defend itself from pressure around it.

Hans Blix *****ed (edit: womaned ) about the low funding of the inspectors, albeit thought their work was a success despite not finding any WMD.

Gadfly thinks past IAEA reports have any relevance now, that the country is invaded and still nothing is found.

79% of the americans believe Iraq has WMD. Is that a news? Only the rest of the planet doesn't share their views or believe everything their government says.

I don't know what to make of it.. a pointless post?

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
No it isn't.


Yes it doesn't


(btw I don't know what it will mean in this context :D)

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
I thought I could take the opportunity to quote Python (Monty)

Customer: An argument isn't just contradiction.
Arguer: It can be.

C: No it can't. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition.
A: No it isn't.

C: Yes it is! It's not just contradiction.
A: Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position.
 
C: Yes, but that's not just saying 'No it isn't.'
A: Yes it is!

C: Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of any statement the other person makes.

(short pause)

A: No it isn't.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Gawd, what a pathetic thread.   "Why Iraq's Weapons don't matter, and the primary source materials to back it up", no qualification no nothing.  How about, "Why Iraq's Weapons may not matter."

Some people may think there is definitive info in the links you provided, I doubt that everyone on the planet will think so.


PS: Hey Holden, thanks for a wicked example of two people not knowing what the hell they are taking about when it comes to discourse.  
« Last Edit: October 29, 2003, 03:11:13 AM by Thrawn »

Offline Torque

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2091
American foreign policy is the best money can buy, it would seem a second bite on the *** is needed for some to wake up and smell the hypocrisy.

Time to buy more GE stock.

Offline Krusher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
Yes it doesn't


(btw I don't know what it will mean in this context :D)


no it won't !

(heck im in)

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
the WMD are buried in the desert, just like the MIG's and chem trucks, they just haven't been found yet.

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
Yes it doesn't


(btw I don't know what it will mean in this context :D)


Have you considered running for political Office?

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
Quote
Originally posted by Gadfly
I realize that some of you will not read these links; your narrow minds are already filled to the brim with your own brand of political straw.  For the others that may have doubts, here is the basis and the facts on the current war on Iraq.  The first link is opinion, the rest are primary source data from the United Nations and the U.S. Government, with some major media links.


Thank you for researching and providing reasonable links to sources of information.

The most telling statement from Blix's report to the UN is the following because it is his best judgement of how to interpret all of the evidence that he and his inspectors saw:

"These reports do not contend that weapons of mass destruction remain in Iraq, but nor do they exclude that possibility.  They point to lack of evidence and inconsistencies, which raise question marks, which must be straightened out, if weapons dossiers are to be closed and confidence is to arise."

This is doubt...

When it comes to killing someone, even an Iraqi soldier and putting US soldiers in harms way... there should be no doubt.

The matter of WMD existing or not will be resolved as time goes by. That will be an irrefutable fact.

If none are ever found.... it will be very sad.... I was hoping to be proven wrong by now.

Quote
Originally posted by Gadfly
Fact that there are restrictions on our freedoms, I can only offer that we are in a War


And I offer that it is our laws and our constitution which set us apart from the very countries and terrorism that we are fighting against.

And we cannot set these freedoms aside even during times of war. We have in the past, and in doing so we were wrong. I'm referring to the incarceration of Japanese Americans during WWII.

That wrong is not being repeated today. However, the Bush Administration is perpertrating an equally egregious wrong with incarcerating citizens and denying them due process.

The right to defend oneself against accusations from the government, the right to have councel, the right to a speedy trial are fundamental rights... and are the foundation of our democracy, and is what keeps us from suffering under tyranny.

I have no problem with the government wire taping phones, and conducting secret searches, invasive searches at air ports, taking finger prints and photographs...

But when the government incarcerates a citizen and denies them their freem to pursue their life - not just a few days... but years, that government must be held accountable, and must have reasonable cause. And a person must be allowed to see the evidence against them and refute it with proper legal representation.

The government has nothing to fear by telling the truth or by hearing the truth... and the government in the pursuit of its goals to protect its citizens is not served by detaining an innocent person.

Secret evidence can be held in a court specially designed for that purpose - this has been done before with the prosecution of spies - like Pollard and Aimes.

The right that our constitution gives every citizen is the presumption of innocence... it makes no exclusion based upon war or peace time.

There is nothing in the constitution which allows the bill of rights to be waved - at any time, for any reason.

And if a terrorist can take our rights away or Mr. Bush can arbitrarily take them away in order to do his job, then we have no need for the constitution or for the laws created by our representatives...

We will become the very enemy we are fighting.

If no WMD are found, history will decide whether or not Mr. Bush knowling mislead the American people. And no doubt Historians will debate for years the purposes behind it.