5.62, -3.28
Some of those statements are very interesting. Take the first one:
"If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."
So this presumes that the interests of corporations are necessarily opposite the interests of humanity? I find this rather odd.
If you are going to assume that corporations will invariably use force and bribery to attain their ends then your answer means a much different thing than if you assume that harmful corporate behavior will be held in check by rule of law.
This statement is kind of like saying: “"If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve the interests of women rather than the interests of men." The underlying presumption does not necessarily make any sense at all.
I answered: “Strongly disagree” to the statement: “The only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders.” But I suspect my disagreement takes a completely different form than that of a lot of people who answered the question identically.
Here is a shorter quiz where the questions appear to be somewhat less interpretive:
http://www.self-gov.org/quiz.htmlHooligan
