Author Topic: 653kmh / 406mph at street; WTG Britons! (Read 903 times)

Staga · « **on:** January 22, 2004, 04:02:39 AM »

Quote

Speed camera clocks motorist at 406 mph
By Lester Haines
Posted: 21/01/2004 at 10:35 GMT
-------------
Since we Brits already hold the land speed record as a result of jet-powered Thrust SSC going supersonic in 1997, it seems only natural that we should attempt to be the first nation to break the sound barrier with a petrol-driven reciprocating-engined vehicle.

That at least appears to be what sales manager Peter O’Flynn was attempting when clocked at an impressive 406mph (653kmph) by a speed camera in Cheshire.
The achievement becomes even more admirable when we learn that Peter was at the time at the controls of a humble Peugot 406, until now thought to have a top speed of 129mph.

Heroic Peter is modest about his tremendous effort, insisting: "I rarely speed and it’s safe to say I’ll contest this." Officials, however, say Mr O’Flynn still faces prosecution despite the obvious attack of insanity which afflicted it speed (sorry, safety) camera.

This superb piece of bureaucratic madness is just the latest chapter in the ongoing saga of the government's war against speeding motorists. We look forward with eager anticipation to police slapping the cuffs on the first OAP to reach hypersonic velocities in a battery-powered disabled buggy.

Dowding · « **Reply #1 on:** January 22, 2004, 05:22:15 AM »

I have formed a paramilitary group to tackle 'Safety' cameras. Armed only with old tires, petrol, a length of chain and a 4x4, we shall seek vengeance against the bastards who form the Safety Camera Partnerships, by destroying their means to wage war on the humble motorist.

SunTracker · « **Reply #2 on:** January 22, 2004, 06:06:49 AM »

I know this is off subject, but George Bush could beat up the king of England.

Dowding · « **Reply #3 on:** January 22, 2004, 06:08:41 AM »

Probably. He doesn't exist. Bush is good when it comes to figments of the imagination.

Staga · « **Reply #4 on:** January 22, 2004, 06:17:38 AM »

LOL !

Mickey1992 · « **Reply #5 on:** January 22, 2004, 07:53:10 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dowding
Probably. He doesn't exist. Bush is good when it comes to figments of the imagination.

Classic.

Wmaker · « **Reply #6 on:** January 22, 2004, 08:21:40 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dowding
Probably. He doesn't exist. Bush is good when it comes to figments of the imagination.

ROFTLOL!!

lazs2 · « **Reply #7 on:** January 22, 2004, 08:24:19 AM »

dowding... don't you realize that the cameras are there for your own good? You could hurt yourself if you speed.

lazs

SLO · « **Reply #8 on:** January 22, 2004, 08:32:48 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
dowding... don't you realize that the http://get-certified.net?go=cameras" onmouseover="window.status = 'goto: cameras';return 1" onmouseout="window.status=''">cameras are there for your own good? You could hurt yourself if you speed.

lazs

doesn't mean the government has to see you hurt

Dowding · « **Reply #9 on:** January 22, 2004, 08:45:32 AM »

Quote

dowding... don't you realize that the cameras are there for your own good? You could hurt yourself if you speed.

That's what the rutabagas who form these Safety Camera Partnerships say.

The only thing I've hurt is my wallet. After 7 years of driving I was zapped twice in 3 months, towards the end of last year - £120 ($200) fines, 6 points out of 12 (12 penalty points and you get an automatic ban), increased insurance and distinct decrease in respect for both the police and the bastards in London who decided to allow the police to keep the revenue from cameras (i.e. we get an explosion in camera population, surprisingly).

And now they want to add a surcharge to the speeding fines to pay compensation to all victims of crime!!!! So if I get caught again, I'll have to pay compensation for some rapist's crime!!!!

Come the revolution....

/rant off

Aaah. Now I feel better.

lazs2 · « **Reply #10 on:** January 22, 2004, 08:58:16 AM »

well.... this is a surprise? dowding railing against the women and womenly voters? what is next.... him handing out pamphlets at my next "end womens sufrage rally"?

you let your momma tell yu what to do and this is what you get... you think that government is there to solve your problems and this is what you get... you use government to take away freedoms you don't care about and they eventually get to you.

revolution? I don't think it is possible in the fat countries like ours and yours.

lazs

Dowding · « **Reply #11 on:** January 22, 2004, 09:10:13 AM »

I'm not a socialist. I'm a moderate who believes in standing on your own two feet. But if things go awry (and sometimes they do), people should be helped to get back into the loop, not dispensed with or thrown on the scrap heap. The real enemy is abuse of the system, corruption, inefficiency and waste, not the system itself.

You're right about revolution though. Not the British way, you know. Far too polite for that kind of thing. We've learned to say 'thankyou' when someone rips the arse out of our wallets.

lazs2 · « **Reply #12 on:** January 22, 2004, 01:30:43 PM »

not that we are much better but....

u do know that your government took away all your firearms don't you? Pretty hard to revolt even if you felt like it.

lazs

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #13 on:** January 22, 2004, 01:36:53 PM »

Typical cops, inflating the speed number to make more revenue for the nanny state.

Staga · « **Reply #14 on:** January 22, 2004, 02:54:55 PM »

You're just jealous you can't show a ticket with such a numbers...

...EVAH!!