Originally posted by Scootter
Dead:
Thanks also for your insightful post, I wonder what would things be like if we keep out of things around the world, Korea, Berlin Airlift, Panama ect, would things in the world be better or worse? We may never know, we as a Nation would be better off if we keep to ourselves. Some day perhaps we will take care of our own and let the EU handle things on that side of the pond, I for one would be ok with that. Thanks again for your input and discussion with out the rhetoric many like to throw around, take care.
Well thanks for the interesting topic. It's true we'll never know whether the world would better or worse off for any war or avoided war - and every war, interdiction or what all has its pros and cons, and every war has at least two sides. Right or wrong, they're all guaranteed to spark off a debate.
An old Taoist story touches on this with an old man who the rest of village reckon is nuts because he sees what they view as good or bad fortune as being indeterminate - "could be good, could be bad: hard to say for sure". The story illustrates it thus: It's good to have a son - but if you have a son he may lose his leg - but if he loses his leg he can't go to war, so he won't die like the other men - by which point the rest of the village understands the old man's behaviour and decide he's wise.
As to why people should have a negative view of the US, I think Kurt Vonnegut, one of my favourite writers (an American, no less!
) and a much wiser and kinder man than me, says it best in
Cat's Cradle:
'I guess Americans are hated a lot of places.'
'People are hated a lot of places. Claire pointed out in her letter that Americans in being hated, were simply paying the normal penalty for being people, and that they were foolish to think they should somehow be exempted from that penalty.'