Originally posted by daddog
I would like to be able to toggle it off for my son, but I will not flip over it.
Forgive the post, but I am shaking and real angry.
I edited it down just to get to the point, not to discount all your points.
Your a good dude, but there is just no reason to get pissed about it. People want to play out violence in games, or more so I think, to have anything that adds to realism and graphic reality.(even though this is pretty cartoon and not offensive to me)
If my monitor could shake instead of the hearing that damn stall horn, I'm for it. If I get a few red sprites on the canopy to show Im wounded, or my windscreen blackened with oil or steam so I can be extra pissed someone has now turned my Dora into a glider, AGAIN, fine. Even if I hated 'gore" as IL-2 calls it, I'd leave it on to make damn sure I tried to not let it happen. It makes for a better game, better purpose to win. Free Blackjack won't build a casino, neither will a PETA hunting game.
Hell, I splattered 500 BF1942 Vietcon last night in a Lan match, and they had a red spray and twitched and died, and when it was AI I was disappointed. When it was my friends I laughed out loud and told them I was the king. Got the same thing back when they killed me. Doesn't make me a gore-potato.
Point being we had a blast playing a game, and had they exploded everytime I sniped them like the "TnT in the pockets" chutes in AH, I'd be pissed at BF1942 for making a war game look silly. Seems to me this is a feature. And at least one guy thought any "gore" in the cockpit should be selectable.
And for the record I agree. It should be.