Originally posted by Arlo
Straw man argument.
Actually no it isn't.
You can find an excellant description of the "Straw Man" fallacy here...
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/...as well many other logical fallacies. It's an excellant site, I hope you look it over.
I'll explain my position using an example. Lets say a person commits a crime in the US and flees to another country. They can't be held accountable, but that doesn't mean a crime hasn't been commited.
It's come down to opinion.
It hasn't come down to opinion, the whole discussion was opinion. What we have been debating is the reasoning and information that we are basing our opinions on.
It seems to me that you might be tiring of the discussion. If that's the case I would like to thank you for sharing your thoughts with me in such and excellant manner. I apologise for any offence and immaturity on my part. And I would like to leave off with this quote. I can't say I keep to it's message all the time but it's a ideal I try and strive for.
"I am one of those who are very willing to be refuted if I say anything which is not true, and very willing to refute any one else who says what is not true, and quite as ready to be refuted as to refute-I for I hold that this is the greater gain of the two, just as the gain is greater of being cured of a very great evil than of curing another. For I imagine that there is no evil which a man can endure so great as an erroneous opinion about the matters of which we are speaking and if you claim to be one of my sort, let us have the discussion out, but if you would rather have done, no matter-let us make an end of it."
- Socretes, from "Gorgias" by Plato.