Yeeeow, Jazz, that's a bit too harsh on the pessimism there! And I don't think any of it can be called a bug, but rather a matter of 'taste' - as some of what you dislike, I really like...
Such as..
The entire clipboard is one gigantic bug. Snaps open to wrong side. Should open to the right if this whole needing to open feature is even worth it.
I don't feel any kind of problem with it..
Takes up entirely too much space.
I don't feel that way..
Setting convergence for B17s is difficult because plane obscures the crosshairs.
This could actually be something that might need addressing, but it's hardly a 'bug'...
After putting the bloody clipboard on right side of screen noticed that the Voice window doesn't save position
Strange..! Mine does. I move it to where I want, and the next time, they'll be there..
Did we really need to lose the Radar range rings?
We still have them. Activated by right-clicking the map.
Entirely new airfield layouts but no longer have clipboard feature to display maps of fields.
We still have them. Activated by right-clicking the map.
NOE planes have icons submerged in water so not readable.
I like it that way. Makes it harder to observe really low planes, as it should be.
I want a feature to turn off the custom skin downloads. No sense in wasting bandwidth to see someones idea of pretty P51.
I don't feel any effects of skin downloads - a single skin has usually two BMP files, which is not such a big file, and downloads over a looooong time.
...
So it's basically..
1) Clipboard that sucks beyond belief - matter of taste
2) Damagable ships - good thing
3) Fractal shorelines - possible aesthetic change in the future
4) Totally messed up hanger stuff - I disagree
5) Change in enemy icon ranges - matter of taste
6) Pretty contrails for bullets - good thing
7) New airfield layouts - good thing
8) Removal of bouncy tiger bug and insertion of bouncy Osti bug - good thing
9) Plenty of ground cover with submerging GVs - good thing, except the 'submerged part'
...
It's not a waste of time. It's seven people, with only 2~3 doing the real code writing, to make all of those changes. It might not be a IL-2 level groundbreaking upgrade as some might have expected.. but you should give it more time. It's a bit unfair to be infuriated in so many things which may yet to prove ultimately beneficial. After all, it's only its first week.