Originally posted by Martlet
Deferment
Kerry's deferment request is common knowledge. The fact that you don't know something about him that was as publicized as that shows you should get your news from someplace other than moveon.org. How can you support a candidate you don't have even basic information about on a topic you're discussing?
Martlet, I don't want to put words in your mouth here.
1) Is this really common knowledge? I mean that article quotes:
[A senior Republican strategist, who asked not to be named, said: "I've not heard this before. This undercuts Kerry's complaints about Bush and it continues to pose questions as to his credibility among ordinary Vietnam veterans."]
if it was so common as you claim, I'd think the "senior Republican strategist" would of known by it.
I'm not saying that Kerry didn't apply for a deferment as I just don't know. Do you have any other links from a more common source that would have a bit more detail?
2) Are you inferring that because Kerry (might have) requested a one year deferment, that he was trying to skirt out of his duty?
If so, why on earth would he enlist in the Navy at a time of warfare and check off that he was willing to go to a warzone? kind of stupid if you ask me. He should of done the smart thing and volunteered for the National Guard and checked off that he wasn't willing to go to Vietnam. My father was in the Navy and he didn't volunteer for which I'm glad.
(BTW, for the record, Bush, Cheney, Clinton, etc., did the right thing in trying to avoid the war. It wasn't one of the "good" ones. It was a lost cause. Clueless politicians (Democrat and Republican) got us in a no win situation there. Oh, we won the battles if we're talking body count, but we lost the war because we didn't have a clear objective. Over 2 million Vietnamese lost their lives, over 50 thousand of our own lost theirs. What a terrible waste. IMHO)