Author Topic: News Posted (Read 537 times)

AKDejaVu · « **Reply #15 on:** November 30, 2000, 02:19:00 PM »

Quote

Sure How about a 12-unit box of beer bottles?

Erm.. Ram? We have laws in the US that prohibit us from providing you with alcohol for at least 4 more years

AKDejaVu

terracota · « **Reply #16 on:** November 30, 2000, 02:30:00 PM »

Es este el mismo RAM que me enseño a dar mis primeros pasos aca en Aces High?
bueno si es asi me alegro de verte de nuevo por aca

.

Espero te animes y te vuelvas a enganchar aca para la version 1.5 , esto va a ser chevere

[This message has been edited by terracota (edited 11-30-2000).]

Wanker · « **Reply #17 on:** November 30, 2000, 02:51:00 PM »

I know at least one La-5 driver that will be loitering near fields hoping to pick up the easy perk plane kill when they have to come in and land!

And it will be so much fun to listen to them squeal!

Weave · « **Reply #18 on:** November 30, 2000, 02:58:00 PM »

Quote: dr. spock to english translation: a 12-pack

Or what is more commonly refered to here in the USA as; "half a rack".

Weave

Carlos · « **Reply #19 on:** November 30, 2000, 03:07:00 PM »

No hi isn't the same RAM,
RAM left FOREVER, slamming the door and swearing.
This must be another one...or a ghost

Staga · « **Reply #20 on:** November 30, 2000, 03:17:00 PM »

...and you are ?

terracota · « **Reply #21 on:** November 30, 2000, 03:20:00 PM »

sure carlos

[This message has been edited by terracota (edited 11-30-2000).]

Wardog · « **Reply #22 on:** November 30, 2000, 03:21:00 PM »

RAM

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But you will never know who I am
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your Handle could be Mini-Mo, But we will all know who you are because of you constant whining. The 1st time you open your mouth it will be a dead giveaway.

Once a baby allways a baby, a new handle doesnt change what you are.

Dog out.......

RAM · « **Reply #23 on:** November 30, 2000, 03:24:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Carlos:

This must be another one...or a ghost

UHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (sound of a ghost yelling)

Terra, sep, el mismito

. Veo en los scores q ya te manejas genial...has tenido muy buenos maestros en tu squad

Dog, another 12-pack bet for yah, do you accept?

[This message has been edited by RAM (edited 11-30-2000).]

terracota · « **Reply #24 on:** November 30, 2000, 03:27:00 PM »

do you see carlos?

RAM
gracias amigo , bueno no mejor pero si menos peor

Karnak · « **Reply #25 on:** November 30, 2000, 04:33:00 PM »

Hmmm,
I note that the Tempest is in the Perk List. I wonder were this leaves us RAFanatics as far as 1944 aircraft goes? I know that most here think that the Spitfire F.MkXIV is more capable than the Tempest MkV (I think the opposite is true). If others are correct, and that is the case, then the Spitfire F.MkXIV would also prove to be a perk. The Meteor MkIII, leaving out whether or not it can be justified, would certainly prove to be a perk. This would leave the RAF bereft of a 1944 fighter, hell, it would leave us without any fighter from beyond 1942.

On a happy note, I noticed that the Fw109D-9 was not mentioned in the examples of perks, but the Ta152 was.

This could be seen as evidence that the earlier Kurt Tank design would not be a perk plane.

Sisu
-Karnak

Replicant · « **Reply #26 on:** November 30, 2000, 05:55:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Midnight:
Submarine!!!! The Germans had a nice little single man job that could carry 2 torpedos, 1 on each side. I have a pic of it from the Imperial War Museum in London. Will post it if no one else has a pic available. (No scanner, so it will take some effort to get it on-line.)

Hi, here are some 1 man and 2 man German subs:-

Marder (Marten) - 1 man sub

Molch (Salamander) - 1 man sub

Biber (Beaver) - 1 man sub

Seehund (Seal) - 2 man sub (best midget sub)

Yep, these would sure be handy!

Regards

Nexx

SKurj · « **Reply #27 on:** November 30, 2000, 06:05:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Karnak:
Hmmm,
I note that the Tempest is in the Perk List. I wonder were this leaves us RAFanatics as far as 1944 aircraft goes? I know that most here think that the Spitfire F.MkXIV is more capable than the Tempest MkV (I think the opposite is true). If others are correct, and that is the case, then the Spitfire F.MkXIV would also prove to be a perk. The Meteor MkIII, leaving out whether or not it can be justified, would certainly prove to be a perk. This would leave the RAF bereft of a 1944 fighter, hell, it would leave us without any fighter from beyond 1942.

On a happy note, I noticed that the Fw109D-9 was not mentioned in the examples of perks, but the Ta152 was. This could be seen as evidence that the earlier Kurt Tank design would not be a perk plane.

Sisu
-Karnak

Pyro stated this .. " Perk planes (and vehicles) would be things like Me 262s, Ta 152s, Tempests, B-29s, Ar 234s, Tiger IIs, etc."

I don't see anywhere that it says the planes on that list will DEFINITELY be perk.. lets not start whining yet.......

AKSKurj

Westy · « **Reply #28 on:** November 30, 2000, 06:48:00 PM »

Karnak, please stop doing that to yourself. Pyro said what he said and nothing more, nothing less. Stop trying to read into things. It wasn't a finite list of the aircraft being perked, they were examples of what will be.

-Westy

Maverick · « **Reply #29 on:** November 30, 2000, 07:12:00 PM »

Easy solution to perk plane / vehicle problem. Let everyone who has a valid account fly whatever plane they want. No more perk plane problem!

Mav

Perk planes, a solution still searching for a problem.