Originally posted by GScholz
It really doesn't matter under what circumstances the shooting took place. An unarmed and wounded prisoner of war was executed. It is a crime whether it was accidental or not.
Problem with that idea is at the time they didnt know if he was armed or not.
And in light of recent events it was far from unreasonable to assume he was armed.
If he was previously determined to be a POW he should have been cuffed, wounded or not.
Hell police in this country even cuff wounded prisoners
Untill that point I dont see how he can be labled as a POW but still a potentialy leathal enemy combatant.