Author Topic: Seagoon  (Read 1152 times)

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Seagoon
« Reply #30 on: March 11, 2005, 05:20:42 PM »
I prefer the agnostic view.

I can't deny the possibility of something I can't prove wrong. Then again I can't believe in something which I can't verify is there.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Seagoon
« Reply #31 on: March 11, 2005, 05:22:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Siaf__csf
I prefer the agnostic view.

I can't deny the possibility of something I can't prove wrong. Then again I can't believe in something which I can't verify is there.


Agree.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13919
Seagoon
« Reply #32 on: March 11, 2005, 06:31:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SunTracker
[B(3) If, as evidence shows, life can be created by organic objects coming together under the right conditions, what purpose would a God serve?  

Any thoughts, comments? [/B]


Not going to bother with the first two points as they also cannot be proven disproven in any way. Eventually you will know if correct or not.

As to #3, nothing in the statement you list disproves existance of God. Another point, someone or something HAS to be responsible for the creation of matter / universe to begin with. That alone is a strong point in the favor of a Supreme Being irregardless of the method used to come to the point of life as it is now on this little dirtball in space.

Having given you that opening please carry on. I'm not being sarcastic, I just want to hear your next point in debunking the situation I just presented.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline TweetyBird

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1775
Seagoon
« Reply #33 on: March 11, 2005, 07:45:59 PM »
>>Tweety,

The Dead Sea Scrolls were almost entirely composed of copies of the Old Testament and Jewish intertestimental wisdom literature buried by the Essenes (a strict separatist Jewish sect) of Qumran. All of the books were written hundreds of years prior to the birth of Jesus<<


The thing I am intrigued by is not in the New Testament, i.e., the life of Jesus from 12-29. That is not to discount what is in the Bible, but I have to be honest - I'm very curious about the "missing years."

I did mistakenly call it the Dead Sea Scrolls - this is what I am referring to..

http://reluctant-messenger.com/issa.htm

I don't know if its true or not, but that is what I was thinking of.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2005, 07:50:49 PM by TweetyBird »

Offline hyena426

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Seagoon
« Reply #34 on: March 11, 2005, 07:49:03 PM »
Quote
(3) If, as evidence shows, life can be created by organic objects coming together under the right conditions, what purpose would a God serve?
were did that organic material come from? unfair test considering we allready got air and organics..i wanna see some one make life from a vacume and just hydrogen..then ill be impressed,,lol
 
how did a hydrogen atom exploding make something close too 190 elements?<~~think its more than that now days,,lol  heck we still cant make gold let alone elements from hydrogen..i think there are things we will never know...because i flat out dont beleve that nothing condenced into hydrogen and exploded and turned into all these elements and planets..too many loop holes..all runs too nice like a clock for me to beleve that at the moment

Offline SunTracker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
Seagoon
« Reply #35 on: March 11, 2005, 07:55:37 PM »
Quote
That alone is a strong point in the favor of a Supreme Being irregardless of the method used to come to the point of life as it is now on this little dirtball in space.


According to the String Theory, two of the eleven different dimensions collided to create the Universe.

Quote
the Big Bang was surely not the beginning of all matter but simply the creation of this Universe at the moment when two separate dimensions collided with one another. A process which may have happened countless thousands of times.

There are even those who believe that an entire Universe may be created and brought into being in the context of a laboratory setting. Others (see heading below) respond by arguing that the dangers of such research are far too considerable for us to undertake research into areas we  barely understand.



I have no more difficulty believing that all matter has existed forever than Christians have believing that God has existed forever.  And with the String Theory and others explaining how the Universe and Life was created, it all falls into place for me.

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
Seagoon
« Reply #36 on: March 11, 2005, 08:49:02 PM »
Hi All,

Cool Squirrels Eagler, cute as a button daughter(?) as well.  A sincere thanks to all who have posted encouraging notes. I'm currently popping Zicam as fast as I can, but the tickle in my throat tells me I'm probably going to be sick as a dog for Sunday Morning, so this is an earnest request for prayer before then.

Anyway... Apologetics. Gotta admit that's never been my strongest suit, but eh. Before I get started, I focused on the problem of the underlying lack of foundation for evolutionary presuppositions in this essay interacting with the thought of evoloutionary psychologist Steven Pinker. For an even better response this problem (i.e. the way atheism trades on borrowed capital) check here: Why I believe in God by Dr. Cornelius Van Til    

Anyway, Suntracker writes:
Quote
(1) The thought that an all-powerful God would either send, or allow me to burn in Hell forever for just being human.
[/b]

The Bible does not teach that men are sentenced to Hell merely for being human. The are sentenced to Hell for systematically violating God's Laws. All men since the fall are, as David put it,  brought forth in a fallen condition (Psalm 51:5) - which is why for instance you don't have to teach your kids to lie or to be selfish, they come out naturally inclined to that kind of behavior (Eph. 2:1-3). So that there is no one who in and of himself would not be justly condemned by God (Romans 3:10-19).

The bible however is concerned to tell us that there is a merciful remedy for this terrible state of affairs in the atonement of Christ, i.e. that God has provided an atonement for Sin at the greatest possible cost for himself. So that Christ takes the punishment we deserved and his righteousness is imputed to us per 2 Cor. 5:21, divine justice is thus perfectly served. This exchange is detailed in Romans 3:21-25

"But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe. For there is no difference; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed"

Thus through faith in Christ, justice is satisfied and forgiveness and heaven is given as a free gift to all who believe, this is what is know as the "good news" and this is what I'm committed to proclaiming, rather than leaving men at the aforementioned bad news.

Now regarding the underlying principle. Generally, all men are willing to believe that if there is a hell, some men (Hitler, Pol Pot, Dahmer, etc.) have merited it by their actions. We would all agree that it would not be just for Hitler to go to heaven if there was one, and would agree that if there is an all just God it would be just to punish him. I raise this merely to show that even while most men feel that they do not deserve eternity in hell, we can readily see that the concept of punishment  after life is not unjust. Quite the opposite. [BTW - no one in the bible warns of Hell as a real place of eternal punishment more than Jesus, therefore ambassadors of Christ are bound to issue the same warning]  
 
Quote

(2) God not actively showing himself every day so that people could see that he was real, and in effect, saving the entire human population from burning in agony for eternity.
[/b]

Where to begin? The Bible states that to the contrary, all nature declares that there is a God worthy of our worship: "The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork. Day unto day utters speech, And night unto night reveals knowledge. There is no speech nor language Where their voice is not heard." (Psalm 19:1-3) In fact Paul in Romans 1:18-22 declared that the problem was not that we could not know that there was a God, but rather that we deny that we deny the evidence that abounds all around us:
"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened."

The incarnation was the ultimate proof of the existence of God, yet sinful men still denied it: John 10:24-25 "How long do You keep us in doubt? If You are the Christ, tell us plainly." Jesus answered them, "I told you, and you do not believe."

Certainly I can vouch that this pattern of denial and outright anti-theism was what I engaged in.

Quote
(3) If, as evidence shows, life can be created by organic objects coming together under the right conditions, what purpose would a God serve?
[/B]

I have never yet seen conclusive proof of life being formed from inorganic material. To my knowledge no scientist has been able to create even the simplest of one-celled organisms from scratch. Additionally, even if it were shown you still have the problem of overcoming nothingness. I.E. Nothing comes from nothing. Where did the matter one supposes can become life come from? God as Creator, Sustainer,* Redeemer, is in no way eliminated even if one could take inorganic chemicals and synthesize nucleotides in a lab. Time+Chance cannot Create, neither can they Order, or Preserve. Only a Creator can both put the DNA Helix together and keep it that way.

- SEAGOON

* did you bring yourself into being? Do you keep yourself in existence?
« Last Edit: March 11, 2005, 09:03:14 PM by Seagoon »
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Offline JB73

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8780
Seagoon
« Reply #37 on: March 11, 2005, 09:10:15 PM »
Seagoon....

i have a dilema for you.


above you have done your best in this limited medium to not only witness, but back those thoughts up with substantial matter (IE facts)

i have gone blue in the face trying to talk out in person what you are talking about. 12 years of lutheran school made me somewhat knowledgable in the subject.

EVERY time the "wall" was "the Bible is fiction made up to scare us" or someting along that line.

if you have ever seen the theroy on the grand canyon, and formation because of a lake left over from the flood, or the thoughts on the rocky mountians being a giant upheaval form the seperation to bring waters from below during the flood you know there is "scientific" theory's behind it all, contradicting all evolution / plate techtonic theroy's. i say "theory" ans scientific, because we all know science is in fact based on "believed" theroies.

since nothing is proven, how do you prove anything? i have been confronted by people who believe science is a "FACT", and will not budge on that.


those 2 things, the Bible, and the science have stopped me at every pass. i am not the best witness there is, but 2 simple things i can not overcome have halted my witnessing every time to the point i have "given up" and just get SO frustrated in the discussion i have nowhere to go but to back out. nothing i say will convince them, and i fear i am doing something wrong or bad by giving up like i have.

with the exception of going to seminary, how can a simple christian compete with the aithest teachings of our school system? a godless person can gather a library of "fact" in 12+ years of schooling, and a regular person like myself can not compete with that extent of learning.

i know the truth, and have tried to be a good witness, but i have failed so many times i can not count, always those 2 things mentioned above.

what is your advise to remedy that situation -OR- remedy my complete lack of desire to even consider engaging in a religious conversation?

thanks
I don't know what to put here yet.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
Seagoon
« Reply #38 on: March 11, 2005, 09:26:20 PM »
ty Seagoon, she is my grand-daughter

good luck on your cold, zinc, vitaminC, salt water gargle and salt water nasal spray work for me
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Seagoon
« Reply #39 on: March 12, 2005, 12:32:30 AM »
Quote
if you have ever seen the theroy on the grand canyon, and formation because of a lake left over from the flood, or the thoughts on the rocky mountians being a giant upheaval form the seperation to bring waters from below during the flood you know there is "scientific" theory's behind it all, contradicting all evolution / plate techtonic theroy's. i say "theory" ans scientific, because we all know science is in fact based on "believed" theroies.


JB I haven't studied this specific event but I'm 99% sure that this occurrence took place a million or so years before there was any kind of human civilization on earth. I'd be surprised if there had been anything walking on two legs even, not to mention having technology to build towns, clothes and ships.

Faith can blind you. Enough to overlook massive and critical details such as error of a million or so years in time.

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
Seagoon
« Reply #40 on: March 12, 2005, 12:08:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TweetyBird
>>Tweety,

The Dead Sea Scrolls were almost entirely composed of copies of the Old Testament and Jewish intertestimental wisdom literature buried by the Essenes (a strict separatist Jewish sect) of Qumran. All of the books were written hundreds of years prior to the birth of Jesus<<


The thing I am intrigued by is not in the New Testament, i.e., the life of Jesus from 12-29. That is not to discount what is in the Bible, but I have to be honest - I'm very curious about the "missing years."

I did mistakenly call it the Dead Sea Scrolls - this is what I am referring to..

http://reluctant-messenger.com/issa.htm

I don't know if its true or not, but that is what I was thinking of.


Hi Tweety,

I encountered Notovich's work while I was still traveling in New Age circles. It follows the general tenor of all the Aquarian or new age speculations about Jesus that were popular in the late 1880s. You'll find the same kind of general "ascended master from the east" teachings in the works of Blavatsky, Cayce, and rehashed constantly in New Age writings. The appeal of these works is that they present a Jesus radically different from the Jesus of the New Testament, a Jesus who makes no claims to divinity, does not establish a church, does not speak of sin, salvation, consequences, or really seem connected to the Old Testament canon in any way. The New Age Jesus is, as many have observed, not even Jewish. Additionally, the Jesus of the New Age/Theosophist movement is a gnostic Jesus, and far from preaching a universal message intelligible to even the smallest child, he's all about secret wisdom, jeleously guarded and imparted only to a tiny circle of enlightened Aquarians.

These two Jesus's are incompatible, their messages, approach, background and culture do not sync-up at any point.  The Jesus from the gospels pushes  natural men out of their comfort zones - he convicts, angers, confronts, breaks us down, forgives and heals, the new age Jesus makes us feel good where we are. Personally, I've found that the gospel of Jesus of Nazareth has an enduring power that makes the "secret wisdom" of "St. Issa of Tibet" pale by comparison.

- SEAGOON
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
Seagoon
« Reply #41 on: March 12, 2005, 12:49:36 PM »
Hi JB73,

Quote
with the exception of going to seminary, how can a simple christian compete with the aithest teachings of our school system? a godless person can gather a library of "fact" in 12+ years of schooling, and a regular person like myself can not compete with that extent of learning.

i know the truth, and have tried to be a good witness, but i have failed so many times i can not count, always those 2 things mentioned above.

what is your advise to remedy that situation -OR- remedy my complete lack of desire to even consider engaging in a religious conversation?
[/B]

Well, first let me say I can sympathize, Christian apologetics (giving "an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have" - 1 Peter 3:15) while it is something we are called to has never been easy. Keep in mind that after Christ preached his first sermon in Nazareth his own neighbors wanted to throw him over a cliff and he warned "if the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you." But that said, obviously it is something that we must be entered into with gentleness and respect, and keeping the admonition never to repay evil for evil foremost in your mind.

Anyway, I'm no apologetics wiz, but here are some general thoughts. First, keep in mind that your calling is to give a defense and that winsomely, not to "crush your opponent" with facts. And no, you don't need to go to seminary unless you have a calling to do so. I'd outline the following simply policy:

1) Concentrate first and foremost on your own heart and life. If you are defending a faith its obvious that you don't practice yourself, then your best presentation is going to seem utterly phoney and unconvincing. To that end,  take stock of your own "non-verbal witness" and that of your family. Ask yourself am I a strong and sincere Christian? Do I pray? Do I read the word? Am I striving to live a sanctified life? Am I serving others or seeking to be served all the time? Am I patiently instructing my kids, are we gathering together for family worship? Am I good about "not forsaking the assembling" of the saints on Sunday? Also what is my demeanor? Do I endeavor "to stir up love and good works?" Have I really "died to self?" These aren't easy either, but they make a world of difference in any presentation.

2) Be as conversant as you can be with the "hope that you have" that means a daily study of the word and reading through edifying material. You'll find that nothing hamstrings your ability to introduce others to Christ than giving the impression that you don't know him very well yourself. Also remember we aren't selling a product as Sandman put it, we are introducing someone to the Savior who should be first in our own hearts.

3) Read some good general introductions to apologetics. I'd start with "Mere Christianity" by C.S. Lewis and then move on to the works of R.C. Sproul. They are written for laymen and are a quick read, but really do open up a treasure-trove of Christian Philosophy, Science, Theology, and make it accessible. Try the following titles by Sproul - Not a Chance, Defending your Faith, Reason to Believe, Renewing Your Mind and Consequences of Ideas. They'll open up an armory you never knew existed. You can get all of the books I mentioned online for a pittance at:
CVBBS.COM
which really is the cheapest source for new Christian books on the net.

Anyway, I hope that helps. I really would encourage you strongly to pick up some of those books "Tolle, Lege!" as was said to Augustine - "Take up and read!" If you have any other specific questions, feel free to ask or email me privately. Be ye not discouraged brother! The weapons you have at your disposal really are mighty for pulling down strongholds.

- SEAGOON

PS: Two last pieces of advice. In a discussion, listen, no one really listens to anyone else anymore. We just wait impatiently for our chance to speak again. Also, actually care about the person you are speaking to. No one generally gives a damn about anyone else other than themselves and the world knows it. If you do, it'll be noticed.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2005, 12:54:59 PM by Seagoon »
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Offline Halo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3222
Seagoon
« Reply #42 on: March 12, 2005, 06:54:24 PM »
Impressive site.  Good to hear from people who take a stand based on lots of study and research.
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. (Seneca, 1st century AD, et al)
Practice random acts of kindness and senseless beauty. (Anne Herbert, 1982, Sausalito, CA)
Paramedic to Perkaholics Anonymous

Offline TweetyBird

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1775
Seagoon
« Reply #43 on: March 14, 2005, 10:35:31 PM »
>>I encountered Notovich's work while I was still traveling in New Age circles. It follows the general tenor of all the Aquarian or new age speculations about Jesus that were popular in the late 1880s. <<

Define "new age."

Then define "holy roller."

I'm sorry if I took this wrong but it seemed like an unqualified, subjective opinion to me.

>>the new age Jesus makes us feel good where we are.<<

How horrible. No vengeance or anything? How can anyone make any money with that?

Give me the old testament anyday - where they pluck out eyeballs..and do all sorts of dismemberments.
How dare they be a peaceful or subtle solution.

I'm glad I'm not 14 anymore
« Last Edit: March 14, 2005, 10:39:54 PM by TweetyBird »

Offline Reschke

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7724
      • VF-17 "The Jolly Rogers"
Seagoon
« Reply #44 on: March 15, 2005, 12:35:02 AM »
Guys for those who want to spend the time reading it there is a great little book out there called "The Science of God". We did a 6 week study on it in our couples class and it was rather enlightening and entertaining. It poses many questions and attempts to provide answers to those and many other questions.

In short there can't be a true answer to if there is a being we call God or not. I believe there is and that is enough for me to have faith that in the end all will be forgiven and that I need to do my best with His help to live each day to its fullest and teach my children the difference between right and wrong. To do otherwise would be wrong and not what this planet needs from any of us.
Buckshot
Reschke from March 2001 till tour 146
Founder and CO VF-17 Jolly Rogers September 2002 - December 2006
"I'm baaaaccccckkk!"