Originally posted by Chairboy
Toad, with respect, I'm not going to be your monkey. I've answered the points in the above and other posts in this thread.
Chairboy, with respect, I don't want you to be my anything.
With respect, I don't see where you've answered the points, either.
You complain that Mayfield was incorrectly held as a "material witness". The material witness law significantly pre-dates 9/11 and the PA, dating back to the eighteenth century.
The FBI had a computer match to Mayfield on one of the bags in the Madrid bombing. Mayfield was released as soon as Spanish authorities said the fingerprints found on the plastic bag belonged to an Algerian identified as Ouhnane Daoud.
Your point was:
The Patriot act replaces the presumption of innocence until proven guilty with something more sinister. The police can, at their discretion, 'short-circuit' many of the checks and balances that the founding fathers and two centuries of judicial oversight have instituted into our justice system.
Where in the arrest of Mayfield did the this stuff happen due to the PA? (Arrest as a "material witness" dates prior to the PA.)
What would you have preferred, that they ignore the one fingerprint and if he WAS in on the plot take the chance of him escaping? Or hold him until they could indict or clear him for sure?
You haven't addressed any of those questions as far as I can see.
Similarly, with respect, you have posted the "PA/homeless/train station" example but haven't explained how moving them out of the train station differs in the least from allowing only ticketed passengers inside the security perimeter at an airport.
Should we have similar security perimeters at our train stations? It's clear the terrorists consider trains/subways an excellent venue for their operations.
If we do have such security perimeters, doesn't it make sense to allow only ticketed passengers inside the perimeter?
I'm sorry, but I don't see where you've addressed either of these issues.
You have complained about these two situations as abuses of our freedom under the PA but don't seem to be able to explain why you think that might be so.