Author Topic: a-26  (Read 5277 times)

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
a-26
« on: August 13, 2005, 04:23:41 PM »
how about an A-26 with 8 nose and 10 wingmouted 50.cals
« Last Edit: August 13, 2005, 05:14:02 PM by cobia38 »


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17773
Re: a-26
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2005, 06:56:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by cobia38
how about an A-26 with 8 nose and 10 wingmouted 50.cals



 ::sniff:: I miss  the vader too.

Can we trade in the A 20 for it?
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline 800nate

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 82
Re: a-26
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2010, 03:54:21 PM »
+1

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: a-26
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2010, 05:03:48 PM »
-1

We need aircraft that were major participants in the war added.  Things that barely played a role can wait.  It isn't like the US planeset is lacking in capability.

B-17E, B-17F or B-24D I can get behind though.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline stephen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 744
Re: a-26
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2010, 05:10:07 PM »
Naaaah, we need an A-26...

And the perk price lowerd on the mossie, who flys that thing anyway/?
Spell checker is for Morrons

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: a-26
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2010, 05:52:29 PM »
how about an A-26 with 8 nose and 10 wingmouted 50.cals

Is it that necessary to have that many guns.  What will happen is people will HO with it, I can see text 200 whining right now.   
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: a-26
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2010, 05:54:19 PM »
Is it that necessary to have that many guns.  What will happen is people will HO with it, I can see text 200 whining right now.   

no different than getting in front of a 110, if your dumb enough to do it you deserve it.

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: a-26
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2010, 05:59:30 PM »
Is it that necessary to have that many guns.  What will happen is people will HO with it, I can see text 200 whining right now.   

Then let them whine.
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10447
Re: a-26
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2010, 06:17:13 PM »
how about an A-26 with 8 nose and 10 wingmouted 50.cals


  So much for saving HTC $$$ on 50 cal bullets............... :devil

  Would be nice to see at some point,have found memories of flying it in another sim. :aok



    :salute

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: a-26
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2010, 06:22:27 PM »
no different than getting in front of a 110, if your dumb enough to do it you deserve it.

Big difference with you have a 110 HOing you with 20/30 MM over 18 x .50 cals.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: a-26
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2010, 07:06:14 PM »
Big difference with you have a 110 HOing you with 20/30 MM over 18 x .50 cals.

How's it any different?  If you HO a 110, you should expect to die.  If you HO an A-26, you should expect to die.
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: a-26
« Reply #11 on: October 22, 2010, 07:57:06 PM »
-1

We need aircraft that were major participants in the war added.  Things that barely played a role can wait.  It isn't like the US planeset is lacking in capability.

B-17E, B-17F or B-24D I can get behind though.

I can understand your train of thought here, BUT: haven't the last 2 or 3 planes added been planes that were major participants?

Time for something fun! :rock

Gettin a little sick of filling the "gaps".

A-26  all the way!! :pray


"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline DEECONX

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1502
Re: a-26
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2010, 08:08:18 PM »
INVADA!  :aok

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: a-26
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2010, 08:28:23 PM »
I can understand your train of thought here, BUT: haven't the last 2 or 3 planes added been planes that were major participants?

Time for something fun! :rock

Gettin a little sick of filling the "gaps".

A-26  all the way!! :pray



The last plane added was the Mosquito Mk XVI, something that was not a "fill the gap" addition and much more of an "uberplane" addition.  The most recent announcement was the G4M1, which was a "fill the gap" announcement.  I believe the P-47M was the aircraft prior to the Mosquito Mk XVI, and that is another pure "uberplane" addition.  So of the last three, two were "uberplanes" and one was a "fill the gap" addition.

There are not terribly many "uberplanes" left to be added.  The A-26 is one of those.

Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: a-26
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2010, 09:08:44 PM »
The last plane added was the Mosquito Mk XVI, something that was not a "fill the gap" addition and much more of an "uberplane" addition.  The most recent announcement was the G4M1, which was a "fill the gap" announcement.  I believe the P-47M was the aircraft prior to the Mosquito Mk XVI, and that is another pure "uberplane" addition.  So of the last three, two were "uberplanes" and one was a "fill the gap" addition.

There are not terribly many "uberplanes" left to be added.  The A-26 is one of those.



Maybe its just me, but the Mosquito and the 47m were more of a modification of already existing airframes.

The 25 and the Brewster were "fill the gap" planes as well as the G4 and the P-39. (but who's countin?)

Its time for another "uber"plane.
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP