B-29 Super Fortress

[Meatwad]

Originally posted by 1men8women
ok ill copramiste hows about a B-29 w/o nuclear capabilaties

i dont know i think a nuke is a bit to much

WTF is copramiste? Sounds like cop aftershave to me

Search is your friend. If you use that little search button and enter the words "B-29", magical things happen

[SuperDud]

I don't have the strength.

[Treize69]

[Brenjen]

Originally posted by RAIDER14
spend your perks on something worth flying a 234's only defense is its speed that rear gun doesn't do much though I think it gives you a speed boost

 Hey RAIDER14...NEWS FLASH- THERE ISN'T ANY OTHER PERKED BUFF

 Apparently "a noob YOU are"

[cav58d]

Originally posted by Meatwad
WTF is copramiste? Sounds like cop aftershave to me

Search is your friend. If you use that little search button and enter the words "B-29", magical things happen

Yea your not kidding about magic happening...The search engine will explode, and a medium sizec mechanical arm will come out of your tower and slap you in the face:furious

[Bogie603rd]

You know, they should make a rule in this forum: NO ASKING FOR B-29'S! IT AINT GONNA HAPPEN!

Geez, do you people know how much terrain 1 nuke blows up? 25 FRIGGIN MILES! That is 1 square in AH. 1 MA mission could end the war with a formation of B-29's! 1 b-29 per square. Boom, war is won. Now all we have to do is fly in C-47's and finish this.

I say no to B-29's. Even if they don't add a nuke, and just add a regular payload to it. It would spark TOO MUCH CONTROVERSY. All the newer people would say.. NUKE NUKE NUKE, WE WANT NUKES ON OUR B-29'S! And all the veterans of AH would want to get rid of the B-29 because it has a tail 20 MM cannon, has a lot of armor. And can carry way more than a lancaster and a B-17!

NO NO NO NO NO TO THE B-29!

[SuperDud]

Originally posted by cav58d
Yea your not kidding about magic happening...The search engine will explode, and a medium sizec mechanical arm will come out of your tower and slap you in the face:furious

[1men8women]

real good one i just tryed B-29 8 times and it did not WORK

[Bogie603rd]

MY GOODNESS!!! WHY ARE WE HAVING THIS DISCUSSION WHEN JUST A FEW HOURS EARLIER WE HAD THIS SAME DAM DISCUSSION JUST A FEW THREADS BELOW THIS ONE!

[moneyguy]

if i remember history class at all, i thought only 2 nooks were used in WWII. doesn't seem like it was used enough for this game. in other words....



NO NOOKS!


or B29's

[Bogie603rd]

AMEN! And it's Nukes;)

[SuperDud]

No it's nooks, get a clue noob!

[Hap]

i'd love to have a superfortress in the plane set.  could care less about a nuke.  seems silly.  

but to have that plane would be a treat.  

my main reason is how cool it would look from the pilot's seat looking out of that canopy.  yup would be fun.  says it toted a 20k payload.  B17 has a 6k payload, b24 an 8k and a lanc i've forgotten.

shoot, let em in but no formation . . . which would be few k less than a b24.  or let em fly in formation and perk the snot out of them give guys something to spend bomber perks on in addition to the arado.

also, my guess is they'd be just as vulnerable to 163 attacks at 35k as current buffs are.

hap

[Treize69]

We should fund a study on how many peoples first post is a request for the B-29...

[RAIDER14]

Originally posted by moneyguy
if i remember history class at all, i thought only 2 nooks were used in WWII. doesn't seem like it was used enough for this game. in other words....



NO NOOKS!


or B29's

the b29 was used a lot during ww2 do research before posting:rolleyes: