revise teh 190 lineup (please :) )

[1K3]

Can AH have a better representatibe lineup for FW-190s?

FW-190A-3
* 1st massed produced of FW-190s
* Introduced in mid 1942
* Served until 1943

FW-190A-6
* This plane is similar to 190A-5 BUT with lighter wings to accomodate outer-root MG-151 cannons instead of MG-FF cannons
* Introduced in mid 1943
* Served until 1944

FW-190A-8 (BMW 801 TS powered pleeese )
* Most produced 190 variant
* Introduced in mid/late 44 (for BMW 801 TS powered 190A-8)
* Served till the end of war

FW-190F-8
* Same as 190A-8 but can this have BMW 801 TS?

FW-190D-9
* Designed to counter the high performance escort fighters (P-51)
* Introduced in 1945 (a 190D-9 with MW-50 boost WAS a 1945 plane)

TA-152H-1
* Designed to dominate allied fighters at high alt
 and counter very high alt bombers like B-29.
* Introduced in 1945
* limited numbers


class dismiss:p

[Furball]

190 is for sissies... NEED MORE SPITFIYAS!

[Wilbus]

Spits are for sissys Furby

Well, F8 and A8 and D9 are there already. Would be nice with an A9 though.

A3 would be nice aswell as would an A6.

[Krusty]

A6 was identical to the A5. The wing was not lighter. It was basically the same wing, with different guns in it.

There were some minor changes to the engine rating if I recall but nothing noteworthy.

[1K3]

(ignore the very first post but...)

How about 190A-6 for 1943 8th AF  v  LW ToD and 190A-4 for earlier campaigns? after these planes are added 190 lineup coverage is complete.

(edit)
PS: pls remove the 190A-5 in the lineup and add 190A-4 and 190A-6, just like what *will* happen to 109G-10   (G-10 will be replaced by 109K-4)   and   seafire IIc   (seafire IIc will be replaced with much uber Seafire L III)  on the next patch:)

[Krusty]

A4 and A6 are too close in performance. It's redundant. It's redundant. It's redundant.

[Skilless]

Originally posted by Krusty
A4 and A6 are too close in performance. It's redundant. It's redundant. It's redundant.

At first I thought you were some kind of moderator.  But now I realize, you're just a troll.
Good luck.

[toadkill]

jesus why dont you just suggest HTC add all fighters produced that had at least a little significant value. i mean you already have 4 190s and like 6 109s. i mean jesus really do you need every single plane ever made.

krusty is more or less the "voice of reason" seems to be chock full of WW2 knowledge.

[Krusty]

Originally posted by Skilless
At first I thought you were some kind of moderator.  But now I realize, you're just a troll.
Good luck.

You're not very perceptive at all, are you? In fact you'd have to be very stipid to think anybody other than HTC staff was a forum moderator. <-- THAT was a troll. What YOU posted was a troll. What I post 99.999999% of the time (not counting this one) are not trolls.

Toadkill: Consider me Grampa Simpson... I gots lots of things to say, but they're not always historically correct.

[1K3]

Originally posted by Krusty
A4 and A6 are too close in performance. It's redundant. It's redundant. It's redundant.

hmm i say the A-6 is a cross hybrid of 190A-4 and A-8 (wild guess)

[1K3]

I think i'll purge the 190A-6 on the wishlist but i relly wish that...

* HTC remakes the Fw-190A-5 to Fw-190A-4.  The 190A-5 has the same power as the 190A-4 but it's heavier and the performance as a fighter is not that good compare to 190A-4.  Fw-190A-4 will be needed to at least cover mid-war segment on West and East fronts.

PS:  If HTC is remaking 109G-10 to 109K-4,  Seafire IIc to Seafire L III,  then 190A-5 in AH should be remade to 190A-4