Author Topic: PT Cruiser thread  (Read 473 times)

Offline Sp4de

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
      • http://www.freewebs.com/decommissisoned1/
PT Cruiser thread
« Reply #15 on: October 07, 2005, 04:17:24 PM »

Toaster on wheels is better

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
PT Cruiser thread
« Reply #16 on: October 07, 2005, 04:23:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sp4de

Toaster on wheels is better


Than what? A toaster without wheels?
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
PT Cruiser thread
« Reply #17 on: October 07, 2005, 04:57:03 PM »
I dunno.   The Scion may be much more reliable but in the quirky category I think I prefer retro.


Always thought a black and white one would be a cool Geek Squadmobile.
« Last Edit: October 07, 2005, 05:01:38 PM by oboe »

Offline Sp4de

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
      • http://www.freewebs.com/decommissisoned1/
PT Cruiser thread
« Reply #18 on: October 07, 2005, 05:55:28 PM »
Both the cars are ugly.

Upside : You wont get shot for your car:)


:D

Offline 63tb

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 152
PT Cruiser thread
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2005, 09:10:22 PM »
I've had one for 3 years. No problems at all. I have a 5-speed which runs better than an auto. I took the back seats out after I had it about 6 months and never put them back in. I put down a piece of plywood instead. It makes a great little panel van. I load up 2 amps, a PA head, 2 speaker cabs, two guitars and various cable bags and it all fits in no problem.

63tb

Offline Leslie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2212
PT Cruiser thread
« Reply #20 on: October 08, 2005, 02:09:47 AM »
One thing I've noticed on cars nowadays is the lack of a forward "rake" on the hood, along with a boxy rear end.  On some cars it works but on most I've noticed it doesn't.  The PT Cruiser is not a bad looking car and neither is the new VW Bug imo.  But those cars are designed to be retro looking.  Hangtime's picture of the old panel truck even has the look of power.  The hood and grill is slightly tilted forward.  Btw that would make a great hot rod project Hang.

An example of the stepping away from the forward rake became evident with the Dodge Ram trucks about ten years ago.  This was a radical look which I didn't like at first.  Too different for a pickup truck at the time.  Though am used to it now.  The new Mustang kinda has a rearward rake up front, which looks ok but could be better with the forward rake.  Just would look more powerful with a forward rake instead of the aerodynamic look.  However I like it just the same, it looks better to me than the previous Mustang.  Would a little forward rake affect gas mileage that much?

I know it's silly, but seems like modern car design is becoming more and more submissive looking and less distinguishable in individual design.  And the "toaster", well there's no excuse for that at all from a safety standpoint, never mind the looks.





Les