See yah!

[dhaus]

Not any more.

[john9001]

Originally posted by Sandman
IIRC, he was tried for that. Oh yeah... acquitted too.

thats funny, i don't remember a criminal trial for purjury.

[JTs]

Originally posted by oboe
Send him to Baghdad to drive convoy trucks for the duration.

geez doing that might make a man of him but i doubt it

[Ripsnort]

Originally posted by john9001
a two year iinvestigation into the so called outing of a "secret agent" and thats all he came up with? What happened to the CIA"leak"?

can you say witch hunt?

can you say 2006 elections?

Here's whats interesting, these liberals (some posting in this thread) are willing to take the New York Times reporters version of a story (Who's past reporters have blatantly LIED and been fired) rather than a government officials version of a story.  Now, I'm not defending the man, but merely pointing out how folks want to persecute him without having all the facts up front.  Imagine if our justice system ran the way people want it to in this thread? We'd clearly be in the wild west circa 19th century lawlessness.

Libby clearly understood the power of information leaked to the press, as the grand jury investigation showed. While Libby avoided television appearances and rarely was quoted by name, he would talk to a few reporters on background. Two reporters -- Time magazine's Matthew Cooper and the New York Times' Judith Miller -- said Libby told them the identity of a covert CIA operative, Valerie Plame.

He said, she said...

[oboe]

Rip has a point - an indictment is merely an accusation of wrongdoing, not a conviction.    I should have prefaced my suggested punishment with "if he's found guilty."    I apologize for that, and thank Ripsnort for pointing it out.

[Sandman]

Guilty or not, he's gone from the Whitehouse.