Author Topic: OUCH 750 lashes  (Read 1172 times)

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #30 on: November 17, 2005, 12:28:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
I'm a God-fearing individual, I just don't believe you need organized religion to believe. My beliefs are more along the agnostic (sp)lines.


Hey Rip, why god-fearing?

Honestly, if ya think da Big Man, Mr Bigtime Owner of the Big DZ In The Sky is something to be feared, isn't that sort of at odds with 'im being a good hearted cool dude?

I mean yeah, sure I could fear our labrador even if he's cool. He can potentially kill me. But his nature is gentle.

So the G-man cannot be compared to old Max. The parallel I'm trying to draw is pretty obvious though. Don't pull Max's tail. Don't mess the Ultimate Swooper's things. And you oughtta be ok.

An entity needs to utilize fear when it cannot garner authority or respect in other ways. My opinion, naturally.

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #31 on: November 17, 2005, 01:00:09 PM »
Hi St. Santa,

Quote
Originally posted by StSanta
Hey Rip, why god-fearing?

Honestly, if ya think da Big Man, Mr Bigtime Owner of the Big DZ In The Sky is something to be feared, isn't that sort of at odds with 'im being a good hearted cool dude?

I mean yeah, sure I could fear our labrador even if he's cool. He can potentially kill me. But his nature is gentle.

So the G-man cannot be compared to old Max. The parallel I'm trying to draw is pretty obvious though. Don't pull Max's tail. Don't mess the Ultimate Swooper's things. And you oughtta be ok.

An entity needs to utilize fear when it cannot garner authority or respect in other ways. My opinion, naturally.


In the bible the "fear of the Lord" that a God-fearing individual has is not a reference to a kind of craven or cowed fear that someone would feel towards a tyrant or a brutal thug. The fear of the Lord in the Bible is more the feeling of respect, awe, reverence, and honor that a son should feel towards a strong father.

In it, there is a relationship implied between the person and the Lord, one in which the Lord is respected and loved both for who he is but also because of his dealings with that person. One is also definitely aware of his ability to rightly chastise, and eager to avoid that situation. The Lord is kind, but not indulgent. Longsuffering and patient, but not so much so that he will spoil his children or leave them unchastened when that is what they need. Therefore those who fear the Lord are called wise, in fact they do so because they are wise, while those who do not rightly fear him are described as foolish.

Here are a few biblical passages that unpack this concept more fully:

And now, Israel, what does the LORD your God require of you, but to fear the LORD your God, to walk in all His ways and to love Him, to serve the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, and to keep the commandments of the LORD and His statutes which I command you today for your good?" (Deuteronomy 10:12-13)

In the fear of the LORD there is strong confidence, And His children will have a place of refuge. The fear of the LORD is a fountain of life, To turn one away from the snares of death. (Prov. 14:26-27)

The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge, But fools despise wisdom and instruction. (Proverbs 1:7)

Wisdom and knowledge will be the stability of your times, And the strength of salvation; The fear of the LORD is His treasure. (Isa. 33:6)

Do not let your heart envy sinners, But be zealous for the fear of the LORD all the day; For surely there is a hereafter, And your hope will not be cut off. (Prov. 23:17-18)

Then the churches throughout all Judea, Galilee, and Samaria had peace and were edified. And walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, they were multiplied. (Acts 9:31)

- SEAGOON
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #32 on: November 17, 2005, 03:22:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by mora
Nuclear power is one option but we are running low on uranium also, it's price will skyrocket if there's any major increase in nuclear power production.



Source please?

I want to see a document signed off by the IAEA stating the above.

<<<  Taught nuclear weapons, war and arms control and did ALOT with FBR, PWR and LWRs at University of Illinois.

Wolfala
« Last Edit: November 17, 2005, 03:25:50 PM by Wolfala »


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5705
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #33 on: November 17, 2005, 04:09:52 PM »
You can't run a country on a book of religion..not by a heap,a lump or a smidgion.

frank zappa
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #34 on: November 18, 2005, 02:27:23 AM »
Quote
I'm a God-fearing individual, I just don't believe you need organized religion to believe. My beliefs are more along the agnostic (sp)lines.


Yet you believe that you can be righteous in your belief and judge another man for not having one. That's the definition of a religious extremist.

That's what AQ is made of.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline mora

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2351
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #35 on: November 18, 2005, 02:46:14 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wolfala
Source please?

I want to see a document signed off by the IAEA stating the above.

<<<  Taught nuclear weapons, war and arms control and did ALOT with FBR, PWR and LWRs at University of Illinois.

Wolfala


I don't have link, but I read in a technical magazine that all the known uranium is going to last for 60 years at the current level of consumption, if there's no major technological breakthrough in more efficient reactor technology and mining. If we want to power all cars with hydrogen (which is impossible with the current fuel-cell technology, a rotary "Wankel" internal combustion engine might be another solution), the nuclear power production must be increased manyfolds. That would mean that the uranium supplies would last only a few decades, and the production of uranium would peak long before that, and it's price would skyrocket.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #36 on: November 18, 2005, 05:03:57 AM »
Quote
Current usage is about 68,000 tU/yr. Thus the world's present measured resources of uranium in the lower cost category (3.5 Mt) and used only in conventional reactors, are enough to last for some 50 years. This represents a higher level of assured resources than is normal for most minerals. Further exploration and higher prices will certainly, on the basis of present geological knowledge, yield further resources as present ones are used up. There was very little uranium exploration between 1985 and 2005, so a significant increase in exploration effort could readily double the known economic resources, and a doubling of price from present levels could be expected to create about a tenfold increase in measured resources, over time.

This is in fact suggested in the IAEA-NEA figures if those covering estimates of all conventional resources are considered - 9.7 million tonnes (beyond the 3.5 Mt known economic resources), which is some 140 years' supply at today's rate of consumption.  


 source
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline WhiteHawk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1815
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #37 on: November 18, 2005, 06:57:15 AM »
i ve  heard only the toughest of the the tough can take 15 lashes without passing out from the pain.

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #38 on: November 18, 2005, 12:31:05 PM »
Hey SeaGoon. You're one of the Christians who's fun to discuss with. Enjoyed reading your posts while in lurk mode.

Quote
Originally posted by Seagoon

In the bible the "fear of the Lord" that a God-fearing individual has is not a reference to a kind of craven or cowed fear that someone would feel towards a tyrant or a brutal thug. The fear of the Lord in the Bible is more the feeling of respect, awe, reverence, and honor that a son should feel towards a strong father.


That's respect, not fear. While to some it may be a matter of semantics, I don't think it is.

To use a real life example: I respect the canopy I am flying. It's very small, high performance and it can do incredible things. It can also turn around and bite me on the ass. Spin up for seemingly no reason. It's ground hungry and throws a lot of altitude in a turn.

Had I feared the canopy, I would not be jumping it. There is a certain element of fear involved yes, but it is not the main thing giving "authority".

The G-man is my main man. He knows a lot of cool tricks and I wouldn't want to piss him off. But I don't fear him as such because what sets of his anger is behaviour I find morally wrong and thus try to avoid. We're pretty much in agreement there, me and 'im.

The relationship is pretty clear: he is inifinitely much more powerful than me and could turn me into a toad if he wanted to. He won't do it unless he feels he needs to (I hope). So, perhaps I should fear that, but I don't. Can't stop it if he decides to on a whim. I trust 'im to be more fair than that.

And, even with all his power, I still got free will ya know? So, as long as I am ready to accept all the consequences of my actions - he really cannot stop me. That would be against his own essence. If he follows the rules. No one knows if he does, though some claim to have knowledge of a) his intention to follow the rules and b) what the rules actually are. So he could stop me. Maybe. Who knows. It's not massively important anyway. I do my thing and then we see how things turn out.

Anyway, so we have this massively powerful benign deity who quite obviously has a huge amount of humor (see Boy Bands for instance, or the way our eyes evolved). The dude is gonna forgive most mistakes I make, as long as they are just that - mistakes, and as long as I strive to improve myself. And I have this Free Will thing. Which is really a nifty thing to have. So we have this relationship right? He chills out and if I do something he disapproves of, he can fry my arse in a variety of ways. On the other hand, as long as I am ready to accept the consequences of my actions, I can do whatever I want. No stopping me from his side, he's cool with that.

What does stop me from randomly walking around killing people is not so much the threat of eternal damnation (from which I am sure some fear could spring), but rather my internal moral compass. Perhaps his test to me is to see how well I can align my actions with my internal compass - and how my internal compass is aligned to his house rules. Maybe I get to know this some time, maybe I don't.

So, respect is in order. But my actions are not guided by fear of godly punishment, but rather by my own morals. Religious people sometimes are quick to suggest that it is of divine origin but that the owner can corrupt it. I don't know, so I will just say it's possible it is and it's possible it's not, because that's a whole other discussion.

As far as the Bible goes, I think Jesus himself would be pretty upset about how the King James bible came to be. Selective editing? What about all the stuff that was left out? I mean, c'mon, there were lots of people writing about the guy who got nailed up because he asked us to be nice to each other. History is written by the winners, and what we have today is the Winner's Bible Version. In other words, Free Will in action again. My guess is the G-man is chuckling at all this and mumbling "no no no my children, that wasn't what I meant!". Though many of us are misguided, I feel that those who proclaim to have the answers is more so than others. This is not directed at religions as such, but more of a general observation of mine.

The Bible says fear the G-man. My internal compass says respect the dude.

Offline wrag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3499
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #39 on: November 18, 2005, 05:06:18 PM »
Hmmm..........

Language?   Original vs translation?   Is the original word FEAR or RESPECT THE POWER OF?

Just wondering.  

The 6th commandment in original is not kill it is murder.   Dictionaries seem to be changing rapidly.  When I was young the ones I read had different meanings for the words slay, kill, murder, execute, etc....  Now I'm seeing stupid stuff like under murder  ... "to murder"  and under slay ... "to slay"  how nice but still no real actual explanation of the word or the original meaning of the word.  Also these words, as are many others, begining to come under an all of them mean the same thing deffinition.  Which to me is very inaccurate.

I understood word slay ... to meet a known opponent, in combat, on a battlefield, and one does not leave the battlefield alive.

The word murder ....  to take the life of an innocent person.
It's been said we have three brains, one cobbled on top of the next. The stem is first, the reptilian brain; then the mammalian cerebellum; finally the over developed cerebral cortex.  They don't work together in awfully good harmony - hence ax murders, mobs, and socialism.

Offline Glasses

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1811
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #40 on: November 18, 2005, 11:44:25 PM »
I think we should worship Engineers.

And follow the verses of calculus and physics.


Then all war would end all religion would end. Most importantly of all  reasoning  instead of faith would conquer all.  

Hail to the gods of integrals and derivatives beotches!

Offline JBA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1797
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #41 on: November 18, 2005, 11:49:28 PM »
Ahh the religion of peace, how I bask in it's warmth.
"They effect the march of freedom with their flash drives.....and I use mine for porn. Viva La Revolution!". .ZetaNine  03/06/08
"I'm just a victim of my own liberalhoodedness"  Midnight Target

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #42 on: November 18, 2005, 11:54:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Glasses
I think we should worship Engineers.

And follow the verses of calculus and physics.


Then all war would end all religion would end. Most importantly of all  reasoning  instead of faith would conquer all.  

Hail to the gods of integrals and derivatives beotches!


"nothing can be engineered before it is technicianed"

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #43 on: November 19, 2005, 02:11:29 AM »
Heh Glasses, unless you're talking software engineers.

Conversation:

Dude 1: this domain model is totally screwed dude
Dude 2: No it ain't. It's sound and reflect the real world requirements
Dude 1: No, it's retarded and non extendable.
Dude 2: Like you know anything. I made my first program manually punching holes in cards, you n00b.
Dude 1: w00t?
Dude 2: and .NET sucks.
Dude 1: TO WAR TO WAR!

Offline Glasses

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1811
OUCH 750 lashes
« Reply #44 on: November 19, 2005, 06:40:51 PM »
Therefore with my reasoning. We Should Worship Kurt Tank. :rofl