Author Topic: So, whats your arsenal? (Read 3607 times)

Furball · « **Reply #90 on:** May 21, 2006, 09:45:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by B@tfinkV
mmmmm testicles.

yoink!

B@tfinkV · « **Reply #91 on:** May 21, 2006, 09:55:06 AM »

deep fired lamb's nuts or roasted pig nuts, which do you think is tastier?

the answer is they both taste like crap, and look worse, but dont ever try raw bulls balls.

Angus · « **Reply #92 on:** May 21, 2006, 10:04:00 AM »

Lamb nuts get roasted in the southern states of the USA. Never tasted any.
In my country we cook them and the make sour. Delicious

And Lasz:
"angus... no problem.. most people who want to ban things don't want the bans to apply to them. They have a "real need" usually. and.... unlike everyone else...."

I want our countries ban for multy-round handguns to continue (the only one allowed in one-shot .22), and I'd rather have none (although I want one) than the ban being lifted.

lazs2 · « **Reply #93 on:** May 21, 2006, 10:09:58 AM »

soooo... the guns you have right now are the most you would accept to be legal in your country for the normal subject? Your guns are allright?

Someone elses choice needs to be banned tho?

lazs

Angus · « **Reply #94 on:** May 21, 2006, 10:59:04 AM »

Multy-round handguns that you can stick in your pocket are banned.
That has resulted in practically none being in circulation.
So, the average thug usually only carries a knife, while the average everybody in his house might possibly have a shotgun or a rifle perhaps.
We can have everything except automatic rifles and handguns. There is quite a bit of hunting going on you see.
You have to go through quite a filter to get guns though, and if you slip in their usage, you're out.
Result is that guns usage in felony is practically none. And still you can be a gun owner and have your hunt.

Brenjen · « **Reply #95 on:** May 21, 2006, 11:04:22 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Angus
Multy-round handguns that you can stick in your pocket are banned.
That has resulted in practically none being in circulation.
So, the average thug usually only carries a knife, while the average everybody in his house might possibly have a shotgun or a rifle perhaps.
We can have everything except automatic rifles and handguns. There is quite a bit of hunting going on you see.
You have to go through quite a filter to get guns though, and if you slip in their usage, you're out.
Result is that guns usage in felony is practically none. And still you can be a gun owner and have your hunt.

It hasn't worked anywhere else, enjoy it while you can. Criminals are not going to obey the law. Gun ban laws only effect the law abiding citizen. When some fruit in your country goes in & wipes out a motel lobby with a shotgun then those will get banned. It's a domino effect & I'm glad we're fighting it here in the U.S. We are gauranteed the right to bear arms & no limitations or restrictions were placed on that right.

Long live freedom.

FX1 · « **Reply #96 on:** May 21, 2006, 12:48:03 PM »

All mine are modern

Deer rifles

Sako .300 mag trigger job with a Zeiss 4-14 30mm tube
Remington .270 700 great gun for the hill country Doctor scope 5-12
Savage 22.250 varmint with a zeiss 8-20 that gun will shoot out to 500 yards all day
winchester 94 44 mag
sks russian
mini 14 pos rifle broke the extractor last week i never really inderstood why people like that gun

Shot guns

Browning over and under 12 ga
bennelli m1 super 90 HK one 28 inch barrell and a 24 inch, Tube extender pistol grip stock for turkey and hogs, this gun is for mexico and has had over 50,000 rounds down it.
Winchester model 12
remington 870 truck gun
bennelli super black eagle 12ga

Pistol

STI .40 rangemaster with a c-more red dot and rail
glock 23 17
SW model 41 .22 c-more red dot
Para .45 trigger job, this is better than the kimber
Kimber widebody .45
Ruger red hawk .44

Bows
Hoyt protec

Thats what i kill all my deer with havent shot a deer in texas with a long gun in 7 years.

Looking for a AK and a storm in .45

FX1 · « **Reply #97 on:** May 21, 2006, 12:53:14 PM »

BTW thank god for TEXAS had a cop pull me over the other day as i was going to the range. We had a great chat and i showed him my babies. He didnt give me a ticket and he is going to come out to our range next month for a family shoot.

Almost didnt remeber my little guns

Remington speedmaster .22
winchester model 52 .22
rossi pump .22
10/22
browning auto .22
charles daily .22 mag bolt action

superpug1 · « **Reply #98 on:** May 21, 2006, 01:35:22 PM »

My truck...

Angus · « **Reply #99 on:** May 21, 2006, 01:44:27 PM »

Brenjen:
"It hasn't worked anywhere else, enjoy it while you can. Criminals are not going to obey the law."

Rubbish. It actually works quite well. Like I said, the thugs in our country are generally NOT armed with firearms. But also because the small arms have always been banned ,so there are hardly any ones in the circulation. That's the whole point.
BTW, the last fatal gunwound in our country actually WAS from a handgun.
The father of the shooter, aged 11 or so, was a merchant sailor and had smuggled a pistol from somewhere. The boy thought it was cool and brought it out to some kids, - it was maybe a grudge, or just cowboys and indians. Anyway, the gun was small enough to allow him to travel quite a distance with it without being spotted. (He even got a ride in a car on the way)
So, it was hot and he shot a 10 year old through the head.

I am not for total gun bans, but IMHO we could do without the little "anti-personel" ones.

Brenjen · « **Reply #100 on:** May 21, 2006, 02:13:22 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Angus
Brenjen:
"It hasn't worked anywhere else, enjoy it while you can. Criminals are not going to obey the law."

Rubbish. It actually works quite well.

Like I said, I'll say it again; enjoy it while you can. You're going back to "it works in my country" & I'm saying, that will change, it has in every other country & city that attempted it.

When you give up part of your freedoms for a little bit of security you're just inviting more control further down the road. It's been proven in many socialist countries that it will not work. Hardly rubbish. Rubbish is saying, "I'll only give up some of my rights, they'll respect the rest of them if I give up just these few"

If you like it, good. I wouldn't put up with it. Those oppressive laws are what revolutions were designed for. The population should not be put on a leash by their govt. & led around by the nose "for their own protection"

If the boy in your story had shot the other kid with an arrow by playing the indian, would the kid be any less dead?

KONG1 · « **Reply #101 on:** May 21, 2006, 03:20:42 PM »

Got a nail gun…quite effective…compressor’s a bit unwieldy…keeps the neighborhood kids away.

Got a lighter looks like a gun…good for taking out stogies.

Got a super soaker …cat suppression.

Got a Guns and Roses cd…makes a good coaster.

Got wicked flatulence…crowd control.

Secret weapon of last resort… ‘F’ bomb.

Angus · « **Reply #102 on:** May 21, 2006, 03:21:33 PM »

You're not getting it.
"I'm saying, that will change, it has in every other country & city that attempted it"

We didn't attempt any special gun law. It was always there basically.
So, no generations of handguns in therotation. Basta.
If you belive in the freedom of holding automatic rifles and handguns, who have no practical use at all, where do you draw the line? Hand Grenades and Dynamite?
We are not a socialist country BTW, and you don't have to go socialist to avoid the poo and arm every nuthead in the country.
A country that doesn't have any problems with people getting shot dead all the time should bloody well stick on it's course, no matter if somebody steps in and sais:
"that will change, it has in every other country & city that attempted it", - or in other words, surrender, - although it works and has been, it won't so drop it now.
Then the silliest of them all..
"If the boy in your story had shot the other kid with an arrow by playing the indian, would the kid be any less dead?"
Depends on the bow, but I'd pick the arrow.
BTW, how do you think that a 11 year old travels 10 miles, mostly by getting a ride, with a lethal bow with him. Or even a hunting rifle for that sake? Now, let me guess, he got where he wanted because he had the gun in his bag along with some toys and stuff....

Hangtime · « **Reply #103 on:** May 21, 2006, 03:47:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Brenjen
Like I said, I'll say it again; enjoy it while you can. You're going back to "it works in my country" & I'm saying, that will change, it has in every other country & city that attempted it.

When you give up part of your freedoms for a little bit of security you're just inviting more control further down the road. It's been proven in many socialist countries that it will not work. Hardly rubbish. Rubbish is saying, "I'll only give up some of my rights, they'll respect the rest of them if I give up just these few"

If you like it, good. I wouldn't put up with it. Those oppressive laws are what revolutions were designed for. The population should not be put on a leash by their govt. & led around by the nose "for their own protection"

If the boy in your story had shot the other kid with an arrow by playing the indian, would the kid be any less dead?

pssstt... in a land filled with laws to protect us from ourselves... consider "I'll only give up some of my rights, they'll respect the rest of them if I give up just these few" the next time yah put on a helmet and fasten yer seatbelt.

Brenjen · « **Reply #104 on:** May 21, 2006, 03:56:13 PM »

Some people will just never get it.

If I were a criminal, I would come to your country & arm the other criminals, because after all you need a market for sales & your admitted lack of these types of firearms is a market.

I never said your country was socialist at all, you're one of those twist plain words to fit your own agenda types.

So you would feel better if the kid was killed with an arrow. That to me is the silliest of them all.

"BTW, how do you think that a 11 year old travels 10 miles, mostly by getting a ride, with a lethal bow with him."

ROFLMAO, you can't be serious with that question. It's simple to travel with a bow here, even for an 11 year old....maybe even ESSPECIALLY for an 11 year old. Ever hear of sawed off weapons? No of course not, that wouldn't fit into your pre-formed opinion mold.

And where do you come up with the "in other words surrender"? Your twisting the plain meaning of what I said yet again.

Get used to crawling on your hands & knees begging your absolute ruler for every little thing because it's coming.

I'm not replying to you anymore, there is no discussion when someone twists words to fit into their own little world ignoring the common meaning & intent.

Good day sir & good luck, may your chains sit lightly upon you.