Originally posted by Angus
Always had a gut feeling that you were a member of the flat earth society.
Gut feeling! I dub thee
scientist. Anyway, since you choked on the manufacture size of the equation, maybe you have some numbers now? Or logic?
Choked? Naw..don`t think so. It is you that haved choked. Your
equation is faulty due to it starting in the middle or close to the end of the process. No magic wands, no on site/on location equipment. Also the question is not dollars and cents.
At any rate, you are burning the barn down to get rid of the rats, in your mystical cure for the theory of global warming.
It or nothing like it is going to take place now or in the future.
But hey......................
The horse is beat to death. You may now salt it down and place it on your porch.
At least you had a theory of something that could possibly be done, as far fetched and sci-fiish as it is. Qatar boy could come up with nothing besides "The Sky Is Falling!" and "I was waiting for that". Such an exciting life.
Now....realsiticaly speaking........really......d
o you actualy see anything being done, now or in the near future, that could have the slightest positive effect to this theoretical problem? What do you propose.......realisticaly? I`m bearing in mind that you said you were still undecided about man`s actual input.
Anymore ideas?