Author Topic: Free Speech .... Burn it!  (Read 1564 times)

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #30 on: June 27, 2006, 09:15:55 PM »
Just had an idea.

Congressional resolution stating that all official US flags be made of fire retardant/fire-proof material.

Problem solved.

Damn, I should run for office...
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #31 on: June 27, 2006, 09:51:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DiabloTX
Just had an idea.

Congressional resolution stating that all official US flags be made of fire retardant/fire-proof material.

Problem solved.

Damn, I should run for office...


I hate to bust your bubble...soaked in any flammable liquid that generates high heats, even those materials will fail

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10164
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #32 on: June 27, 2006, 10:12:14 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
I don't care if people burn flags or not but...

I have never been able to understand how burning them was considered "speech" ..... not even close.

lazs


yah
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WORRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #33 on: June 28, 2006, 02:11:07 AM »
Motion Defeated. By two votes.

I'm still flabbergasted that they even made the attempt... even the concept of abridging the 1st is illegal. That damned right is all but carved in stone!

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[/i]

Can't those baboons even READ?
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #34 on: June 28, 2006, 02:17:18 AM »
Two or three Republican base issues raised so far, two or three to go.

Gotta marvel at these clowns. They think everyone is as stupid as them.

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #35 on: June 28, 2006, 02:17:20 AM »
Hang, quick question for you.


What do you define as speech?  I.E. What is free speech?
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #36 on: June 28, 2006, 02:33:12 AM »
I believe Free Speech is Freedom of Expression.

"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all."   -- Noam Chomsky

Or.. from somebody on the other side of the spectrum:

"Free speech is intended to protect the controversial and even outrageous word; and not just comforting platitudes too mundane to need protection. -- Colin Powell"
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #37 on: June 28, 2006, 03:16:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hangtime
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[/i]

Can't those baboons even READ? [/B]


The motion was to amend the constitution.  The 23rd amendment, repealing the 18th, would have been unconstitutional if changing the constitution was not allowed.

This thankfully defeated motion's purpose was to restrict our speech freedoms, thereby modifing the 1st amendment.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

storch

  • Guest
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #38 on: June 28, 2006, 06:10:07 AM »
see how your respective senators voted send them a well done or a wtf email. do it now.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #39 on: June 28, 2006, 08:46:32 AM »
well... burning the flag is not speech.    It is an act.   It is an expression of an idea but it is not speech.   It is an act that can be benign or... meant to incite.  

It is no more protected under free speech than cross burning or cartoons of watermellon eating colored people.  It is an act meant to incite riot or assault.   In that respect it can be restricted.  If the act causes people be offended to the point of violence then it is wrong..

Not to mention.... I know of very few cities where it is legal to burn anything without a permit.

Freedom of expression is allowed in the U.S. and should be but expression meant to incite violence should not be.

On the other hand... some speech is outlawed for some and not for others.  That is a real violation of free speech.

lazs

Offline Thud

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #40 on: June 28, 2006, 09:16:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
If the act causes people be offended to the point of violence then it is wrong..
 


Did it ever occur to you that the offended people might be wrong instead of the initial act, hardly an objective criterion to allow something, eh?

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #41 on: June 28, 2006, 09:29:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
The motion was to amend the constitution.  The 23rd amendment, repealing the 18th, would have been unconstitutional if changing the constitution was not allowed.

This thankfully defeated motion's purpose was to restrict our speech freedoms, thereby modifing the 1st amendment.


Something of a similar nature, I caught the tail end of something on the news and I'm not sure if the movement has any real possibility of succeeding. Apparently there are some who want every Supreme Court ruling to be considered irreversible. They are so afraid that roe vs wade will be overturned that they are willing to give tyranical authority to the sitting Supremes. Can you believe it?

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #42 on: June 28, 2006, 09:46:35 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
Two or three Republican base issues raised so far, two or three to go.

Gotta marvel at these clowns. They think everyone is as stupid as them.


Did you notice that Harry Reid and Dianne Fienstein both supported the ban?
sand

storch

  • Guest
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #43 on: June 28, 2006, 09:48:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
Two or three Republican base issues raised so far, two or three to go.

Gotta marvel at these clowns. They think everyone is as stupid as them.
geez you sure seem to be slow on the uptake.  when it comes to expanding governmental power, it is clearly a bipartisan effort.

Offline Thud

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Free Speech .... Burn it!
« Reply #44 on: June 28, 2006, 10:05:51 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lukster
Something of a similar nature, I caught the tail end of something on the news and I'm not sure if the movement has any real possibility of succeeding. Apparently there are some who want every Supreme Court ruling to be considered irreversible. They are so afraid that roe vs wade will be overturned that they are willing to give tyranical authority to the sitting Supremes. Can you believe it?


Well, they're panicking since the chances of it being overturned have become less and less academic.
In itself that's understandable, would be a significant leap backwards of American society and judicial system alike, but this (proposed) measure is as draconic as it is ridiculous.