Author Topic: Democlones block open voting in court  (Read 208 times)

Offline x0847Marine

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1412
Democlones block open voting in court
« on: October 16, 2006, 02:13:59 AM »
Democlones squash open primary voting

Here in California the people, via voter initiative, opened the state primary, allowing people to vote for whoever they wanted regardless of party. Its what we wanted, it was put to the people and we choose a blanket primary. Washington State had used the blanket primary system for 70 years.

The democlones ignored the will of the people, of course, and to avoid losing power at all costs the clones promptly sued to block voter choice. They got a US Supreme Court ruling in their favor, "unconstitutional" said the court alleging it somehow suddenly "infringed on the parties' rights" despite working just fine for 70 years elsewhere.

The democlone attitude?, "If they want to vote in the Democratic Party, they can become a Democrat," said drunky hack Herman Farrell, 'chairman' of the New York State Democlone team. No care or concern for the American ideal of free choice, 'choose us, or we wont allow you to vote for anyone else' is the Dem message.

Not surprising, a Google of "independent voters" reveals all kinds of articles that illustrate how both teams try very hard to exclude any other voice in government, like by appointing loyal party hacks to election boards who walk in lock step to protect their respective monopolies of power. Since these hacks are not elected, its nearly impossible to get one fired. If you read these articles, there are plenty examples of these non elected robots following party orders to silence other opinions.

The Board of Elections refused to allow the Richmond County Independence Party to open up their primary in the 61st Assembly District to independent voters, but thankfully was overruled by a federal court. Can you imagine?, these hack actually wanted to deny people choice when voting? neat huh?

Something for ya'll to think about before endorsing either team.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2006, 02:18:58 AM by x0847Marine »

Offline Debonair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3488
Democlones block open voting in court
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2006, 02:33:38 AM »
i thought teh guys from LA who smoke pot are all mellow like spicoli & mel gibson

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Democlones block open voting in court
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2006, 08:09:42 AM »
Same idea in Pennsylvania.  Green party got enough nominations, even though they needed a rediculous amount of people to sign.

So what do the democrats do?  They challenge the validity in the courts, and hold up the whole process so that the Green Candidate loses, but loses without enough time to appeal.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline Mickey1992

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
Re: Democlones block open voting in court
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2006, 08:19:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by x0847Marine
Washington State had used the blanket primary system for 70 years.


You fail to mention that Washington State's open primary system has been ruled unconstitutional twice in the past 5 years.

I don't understand why a voter who is not a member of a political party, should have to the right to choose which candidate represents that party.

As a registered voter not affiliated with a party, I enjoy ignoring all of the primary battles in Ohio.  Let the parties battle it out internally and then I show up on election day.